CHAPTER 3

Project Description

This program environmental impact report (EIR) analyzes the environmental effects of the

proposed development of the Brisbane Baylands (Project). For purposes of this EIR, the “Project

Site” encompasses a total of approximately 733 acres primarily within the City of Brisbane (City

or Brisbane). This includes areas identified in the adopted 1994 Brisbane General Plan as the

Baylands Subarea, portions of the Northeast Bayshore Subarea, and the Beatty Subarea. The

remainder of the Project Site encompasses property within the limits of the City and County of

San Francisco (San Francisco) that is part of the existing 44.2-acre Recology Solid Waste

Transfer Facility (Recology), along with adjacent road rights-of-way. The Recology site is

situated partially within Brisbane and partially within San Francisco.

The Project Site development consists of the following components:

•

A Concept Plan for the development of the Baylands, as required by the Brisbane General

Plan prior to development. The following four Concept Plans are evaluated in this EIR at

an equal level of detail:

-

Developer-Sponsored Plan (DSP). The DSP scenario was proposed by Universal

Paragon Corporation and its subsidiaries (UPC), the primary landowner at the Project

Site, and is defined within the Draft Brisbane Baylands Specific Plan (dated February

2011) (Specific Plan). The DSP includes only the 684-acre portion of the Baylands

within the Brisbane city limits and excludes the 44.2-acre Recology site and adjacent

roadway rights-of-way. The DSP proposes approximately 7 million square feet of

office/ retail /industrial/ institutional uses, 4,434 residential units, approximately

169.7 acres of “open space/open area,” and approximately 135.6 acres of “lagoon”

area. Total new development under the DSP would be approximately 12.1

million square feet.

-

Developer-Sponsored Plan – Entertainment Variant (DSP-V). The DSP-V is also

proposed by UPC and defined within the Specific Plan. The DSP-V encompasses

the same 684-acre area as the DSP scenario. It is similar to the DSP in its

development intensity and land use pattern but replaces the retail and

office/research and

development (R&D) uses proposed under the DSP in the northeast portion of the

Project

Site with entertainment-oriented uses, including a 17,000- to 20,000-seat sports arena, a

5,500-seat concert theater, a multiple-screen cinema, and more conference/exhibition

space and hotel rooms than are proposed under the DSP. Total new development

under

the DSP-V scenario would total approximately 12.0 million square feet.

-

Community Proposed Plan (CPP). The CPP scenario was developed through

extensive community input and designated for study in this EIR by the Brisbane City

Council in 2010. The CPP provides for approximately 7.7 million square feet of

office,

industrial, commercial, and institutional uses, along with approximately 330 acres of

open space/open area and the 135.6-acre lagoon. In addition to the 684-acre area

included as part of the DSP, the CPP includes the 44.2-acre Recology site, which

spans the cities of Brisbane and San Francisco, encompassing the Beatty Subarea

designated in the City of Brisbane General Plan and adjacent roadway rights-of-way.

The CPP does not include residential development. Total new development under the

CPP scenario would total approximately 7.7 million square feet.

-

Community Proposed Plan – Recology Expansion Variant (CPP-V). The CPP-V

scenario differs from the CPP in that it proposes expansion of the existing Recology

facility in the northeast portion of the Brisbane Baylands within the Brisbane city

limits. Under the CPP-V, Recology would expand southward from its current

boundary, replacing the hotel and R&D uses proposed under the CPP just north of

Geneva Avenue and east of Tunnel Road. The existing 44.2-acre Recology site

would expand by 21.3 acres to a total of 65.5 acres, consolidating existing offsite

recycling and corporation yard facilities into one location within the Baylands. The

square footage of the developed areas on the Recology site would increase from the

existing 260,000 square feet to 1,011,000 square feet. Total new development under

the CPP-V scenario would be approximately 8.1 million square feet.

•

Amendments to the Brisbane General Plan as needed to ensure consistency of the Project

Site development with the provisions of the General Plan.

•

A Specific Plan submitted to the City by UPC detailing development for the two

“Developer Sponsored Plan” scenarios. The proposed Specific Plan is part of the Project

Site development included with the DSP and DSP-V Concept Plan scenarios.

•

Proposed expansion of the existing Recology facility, which is included in the CPP-V

Concept Plan scenario only. Although included only in the CPP-V scenario, because the

Recology expansion responds to Recology’s desire to modernize and consolidate its

existing facilities to meet San Francisco’s zero waste program needs, the Recology

expansion could be approved regardless of any action taken by the City of Brisbane in

relation to other Project components.

•

Relocation of existing lumber yards to a different location within the Baylands, which is

proposed under each of the four Concept Plan scenarios.

•

Remediation of hazardous materials contamination within the former railyard and landfill

areas of the Project Site, which is proposed under each of the four Concept Plan scenarios.

•

Water Transfer / Importation of water supply to the Baylands and City of Brisbane, which

is proposed under each of the four Concept Plan scenarios. Under the proposed water supply

agreement, the City would acquire a supplemental water supply of up to 2,400 acre-feet per

year (AFY) via a water transfer agreement with the Oakdale Irrigation District (OID). OID

and the City of Brisbane have signed a term sheet which establishes the framework for a

proposed water supply agreement for the potential future transfer of up to 2,400 AFY

annually for a 50-year period, with possible renewals for additional 25-year periods. The

2,400 AFY includes up to 2,000 AFY to serve the Baylands and 400 AFY to accommodate

planned growth within Brisbane as a whole. The water would be transferred from OID to

Brisbane pursuant to water supply and conveyance agreements to be executed among OID,

Modesto Irrigation District, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) and the

City of Brisbane. Only existing diversion rights and existing facilities would be used for the

proposed water transfer; no new facilities would be built. In accordance with the term sheet

between OID and Brisbane, Brisbane will be responsible for securing the transfer

agreement with MID and the wheeling/conveyance agreement with the SFPUC.

•

Construction and operation of an onsite recycled water plant, which would provide tertiary

treatment of wastewater for recycled water re-use within the Project Site, which is proposed

under each of the four Concept Plan scenarios.

Table 3-1 lists these Project components, showing which components are included in each

development scenario.

TABLE 3-1

PROJECT COMPONENTS ANALYZED IN THIS EIR

Development Scenario

Project Component

DSP

DSP-V

CPP

CPP-V

Concept Plan









General Plan Amendment









Specific Plan





Site-Specific Development

Recology Expansion



Lumberyard Relocation









Site Remediation









Water Transfer / Importation of Water Supply









Onsite Recycled Water Plant









 = development scenario includes this Project component

NOTE: Since the Brisbane General Plan requires preparation of a Specific Plan prior to development within the Baylands, the CPP or CPP- V Concept Plan scenarios would require future preparation and environmental analysis of a Specific Plan.

SOURCE: ESA, 2012.

As part of the analysis of Project Site development, this EIR also evaluates roadways and other

Project infrastructure, including water supply and delivery, wastewater collection and treatment,

and energy generation technologies, along with site grading and remediation. These elements of

the Project Site development are described below and analyzed in further detail in the appropriate technical sections of this EIR (see Chapter 4, Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation

Measures).

Where backbone infrastructure and site preparation elements, such as site grading and other site

preparation activities, and water supply and delivery, would be the same for all four proposed

Concept Plan scenarios, the analysis of impacts related to these elements refers to “Project”

impacts. In other cases, the proposed Specific Plan provides a higher level of project detail for the two developer-sponsored scenarios (DSP and DSP-V) than is available for any of the four

Concept Plans. Where differences in level of project detail exist, as is the case for proposed on-

site infrastructure elements such as roadway configurations, wastewater collection, or stormwater

drainage, the impact analyses refer to individual Concept Plan scenarios. Individual Concept Plan

scenarios are also referred to whenever the anticipated environmental impacts of individual Concept Plan scenarios differ.

3.1 Regional Setting

Most of the Project Site is located within Brisbane in northeast San Mateo County, flanking the

west side of San Francisco Bay. Brisbane is nestled between San Francisco and South San

Francisco, along the west side of US Highway 101. San Bruno Mountain provides a dramatic

backdrop to Brisbane when viewed from the north and east. Views of Candlestick Point and the

Bay to the east are available from the developed northeast-facing slopes of San Bruno Mountain.

Jurisdictions adjoining Brisbane are San Francisco (i.e., the neighborhoods of Visitacion Valley

and Little Hollywood) to the north, Daly City and an unincorporated portion of San Mateo

County to the west, and South San Francisco to the south. A regional location map is shown in

Figure 3-1. As noted above, the Project Site includes the existing Recology site, which spans the boundaries of Brisbane and San Francisco. Only the CPP and CPP-V Concept Plan scenarios

include the Recology site in their land use plans, and only the CPP-V includes the Recology

expansion. The Recology site is shown as “not a part” of the DSP and DSP-V scenarios.

The area surrounding the Project Site includes residential areas in San Francisco, Daly City, and

the western portion of Brisbane, and commercial/industrial uses near the San Francisco/San

Mateo County line and along Bayshore Boulevard. The Visitacion Valley neighborhood of

San Francisco adjoins the northwestern border of the Brisbane Baylands. Candlestick Park, an

existing National Football League venue, is approximately 0.5 mile northeast of the Brisbane

Baylands, east of US Highway 101. Central Brisbane lies directly west of Brisbane Lagoon,

separated by Bayshore Boulevard. Sierra Point, an office/commercial/hotel development with

access to the Brisbane Marina, lies just to the southeast of Brisbane Lagoon on the east side of US

Highway 101. Caltrain, a major commuter line connecting San Francisco with communities in the

Peninsula region and San Jose, has tracks that bisect the Brisbane Baylands, with the nearest

Caltrain station (Bayshore Station) located at the northern end of the Baylands. The Brisbane Fire Station (Station Number 81), operated by the North County Fire Authority, is located on

Bayshore Boulevard just outside of the southwestern edge of the Project Site.

3.2 Project Site Setting

The Project Site is bounded on the east by US Highway 101, on the west and south by Bayshore

Boulevard, and on the north by the City and County of San Francisco. The Project Site is

comprised primarily of the Brisbane Baylands (Baylands), a subarea of Brisbane identified in the

City’s adopted General Plan. A portion of the Northeast Bayshore Subarea is also included within

the Project Site. Two of the proposed Concept Plan development scenarios (CPP and CPP-V) also

include the Recology site and adjacent road rights-of-way, encompassing the City’s Beatty

Subarea and a portion of land within San Francisco. The Project Site boundaries are shown in

Figure 3-2.

The Baylands and Northeast Bayshore portions of the Project Site include approximately

548 acres of land area and 119 acres of lagoon along with 17 acres of lagoon perimeter, for a total of 684 acres. With the addition of the Beatty Subarea, the portion of the Recology facility that lies within San Francisco and adjacent roadway rights-of-way, the entire Project Site consists of

597 acres of land area and 136 acres of lagoon, for a total of 733 acres.

The Project Site is bisected in the north-south direction by the Caltrain railroad tracks and in the east-west direction by a central drainage channel, which is a part of the Visitacion Creek

alignment. The majority of the Project Site is flat or gently sloping toward the Bay, with an

elevation range of 10 to 50 feet above mean sea level. A prominent hill (Icehouse Hill), located at the southeastern end of the Project Site, ranges from 25 to 200 feet above mean sea level with

steep cuts adjacent to the Caltrain railroad and more gently sloping cuts along Bayshore

Boulevard. Project Site topography is shown in Figure 3-3.

The terrestrial portions of the Project Site are located nearly entirely on fill that was placed over Bay mud in the past, with the exception of Icehouse Hill, which represents a segment of the

historical bay margin and is composed of sandstones. Additionally, the northernmost portion of

the Project Site, within the existing Recology site, is underlain by sandstone, shale, and

greenstone (fine-grained volcanic rock). Figure 3-4 shows the evolution of fill on the Project Site.

The portion of the Project Site west of the Caltrain line is mostly undeveloped and dominated by

the former Southern Pacific railyards, but also includes a developed industrial park with 231,400

square feet of building area. The portion of the Project Site east of the Caltrain line is the former Brisbane Landfill site and includes operating industrial uses, including the Recology facility, Sierra Point Lumber and Van Arsdale-Harris Lumber companies, Brisbane Recycling Company (rock

and concrete crushing operation), and Baylands Soil Processing facility, along with areas of

disturbed soil. The Caltrain Bayshore Station is located at the north end of the Project Site,

straddling the existing Caltrain rail line. Existing land uses are more fully discussed in Section 3.2.3 below.

On the vast majority of the Project Site, vegetation and wildlife habitat have been, and in some

cases continue to be, highly disturbed. The site is dominated by non-native ruderal and grassland

species, with landscaped areas containing non-native trees and shrubs also located in several

areas. Native vegetation types, including coastal scrub and perennial grasslands, are confined to

relatively small areas on Icehouse Hill in the western portion of the Project Site, tidal and

freshwater wetlands along the edges of drainage channels and Brisbane Lagoon, and seasonal

wetlands in the western portion of the site. In addition, the Project Site encompasses the open

water/estuarine communities of Brisbane Lagoon, which is tidally connected to San Francisco

Bay located just east of US Highway 101.

3.2.1 Site History

As noted above, the western portion of the Baylands largely consists of a former railroad yard.

The San Francisco & San Jose Railroad (SF&SJRR) Company incorporated in 1861 and the

railroad connecting the two cities was completed in 1864. The SF&SJRR was consolidated into

the Southern Pacific Railroad (SPRR) in October 1870. The SPRR expanded the agricultural

economy of California and led to more innovative ways of shipping and preserving food supplies,

such as transporting fruit and meat in refrigerator cars that were developed in 1880. At the turn of the 20th century, SPRR initiated extensive improvements to the rail line, including the

construction of the Bayshore Cutoff, a new level route in the rail line’s current location that more closely followed the

bay’s shoreline. This route was needed between San Bruno and San Francisco to eliminate the

steep grade through Bernal Cut. Initiated in 1904, construction of the Bayshore Cutoff was one of

the

most expensive segments of railroad that had been built up to that time, costing almost $1

million per mile for its 9.81 miles between San Francisco and San Bruno. After the 1906 San

Francisco earthquake, the area west of the rail corridor was filled in primarily with demolition

rubble.

As part of the Bayshore Cutoff project, a modern freight terminal designed to replace the old

machine shops at 16th and Harrison Streets and the car repair and roundhouse facilities at

Mariposa Street on the old line in San Francisco was constructed on some 200 acres of fill at

Visitacion Bay. The new “Bayshore Yard,” some 8,400 feet long, included a roundhouse, machine

and car shops, and a hump,1 the second to be built on the West Coast. The former roundhouse

(Roundhouse) at the Bayshore Yard was built circa 1907 to service freight locomotives and is now

listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The former Tank and Boiler Shop at the

Bayshore Yard was built in 1920 to maintain and repair the iron boilers on the steam locomotives.

Use of the freight yard ceased in the 1960s and the yard was predominantly idle at the time of its purchase in the late 1980s by Tuntex, now UPC. Caltrain took over the Union Pacific rail line in

the 1980s, and by 1989 nearly all of the railroad spur tracks and numerous other maintenance

shops and smaller support structures had been removed. Figure 3-5 shows changes in the former railyard site over time.

The area east of the rail corridor was used as a municipal landfill by San Francisco beginning in

the 1930s. Starting from the north, dumping continued southward until it was finally stopped in

the 1960s at the edge of what is now Brisbane Lagoon. The construction of US Highway 101 in

the mid-1950s established the easternmost boundary of the Bay fill. The former Brisbane Landfill

site encompasses an area of approximately 364 acres and is bounded by the Union Pacific/Joint

Powers Board railroad corridor (Caltrain tracks) to the west, US Highway 101 to the east, and

Brisbane Lagoon to the south. After closure of the landfill in 1967, the area was buried with a

20- to 30-foot cover of soil and has been used for soil and construction material recycling since

the 1980s.

Simultaneous with landfill operations, various industrial and commercial businesses were

established within the western portion of the Project Site. The Gamerston & Green Lumber

Company, Mars Metal Company, and Jones Hardwood Plywood Company are referenced on the

1946 Southern Pacific station plan of the Bayshore freight yard. Van Arsdale Lumber, now Van

Arsdale-Harris Lumber Company, appears for the first time on the 1962 Southern Pacific

Bayshore-Visitacion station plan. Sierra Point Lumber and Plywood Company, immediately

south of Van Arsdale Lumber, appears to have been constructed more recently (circa 1965-1970).

1 A railroad “hump” is an artificially built hill that uses the force of gravity to propel the cars through the various switches in order to arrange them into various trains without having to use switch engines to guide the cars into place. The hump at Bayshore is no longer extant.

3.2.2 Areas Subject to Remediation and Landfill Closure

Activities

Former landfill and railyard uses have resulted in the contamination of groundwater and soil

within portions of the Project Site. Figure 3-6 shows the general boundaries of these areas.

Potential remedial actions associated with the former landfill and railyard areas are described in Section 3.11 below and analyzed in further detail in Chapter 4, Section 4.G, Hazards and

Hazardous Materials, of this EIR.

Former Brisbane Landfill

The Brisbane Landfill operated prior to modern waste disposal practices and was closed before

formal regulatory design requirements for closure were established. Waste containment at the

former Brisbane Landfill was consistent with the practices of the industry at the time, including

placement of waste fill directly on native soils (RWQCB, 2001). Thus, waste disposal design

features such as liners, segregation of waste into disposal cells, and leachate collection systems were not incorporated into the design of the landfill.

The former Brisbane Landfill was filled in three areas:

1.

A portion that extended eastward about 1,000 feet into San Francisco Bay from the area

near the Southern Pacific railroad tracks was used for waste placement from 1932 until

1952. Following construction of US Highway 101 immediately east of the landfill in 1948,

the Brisbane Landfill was isolated from the direct wave action of San Francisco Bay.

2.

From 1953 to 1959, the landfill was extended an additional 600 feet eastward into

San Francisco Bay and filling of the northern portion of the landfill was completed.

3.

An additional landfill area was created in 1959 when the landfill was extended to the south

and used for waste placement from 1959 until the landfill stopped receiving waste in 1967.

Upon completion of disposal operations, refuse fill materials were covered with earth fill and

other inert debris. Since closure of the landfill in 1967, recycled fill and inert construction waste have been placed on large portions of the site which has served to accelerate consolidation of the refuse within the landfill. A small number of structures, such as commercial and industrial

buildings, have been constructed on the landfill since the 1950s. Portions of the landfill, including streets and parking areas, have been paved.

Over time, approximately 12.5 million cubic yards of waste were disposed of at the former

landfill. Of this volume, an estimated 73 percent was produced by residential and commercial

activities, with inert fill accounting for approximately 25 percent and the remaining two percent

assumed to be liquid waste (Geosyntec, 2012). Waste tires also were placed in the landfill. Aerial photos of the Project Site that were taken while the landfill was in operation show four localized black areas likely representing tire stockpiles. The thickness of the cover over the former landfill area is estimated to range from 1 to 37 feet.

The landfill site is currently overseen by the Environmental Health Division of the San Mateo

County Health Agency, which serves as the Local Enforcement Agency and, along with the

California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), enforces Title 27

regulations related to landfill closure, post-closure maintenance, and landfill gas monitoring

and control. Additional oversight of the landfill is provided by the California Regional Water

Quality Control Board−San Francisco Bay Region (RWQCB). Groundwater/leachate and

stormwater quality is monitored regularly at monitoring wells and outfall locations and reported

to the RWQCB.

Former Southern Pacific Railyard

The former railyard encompasses approximately 228 acres, including some offsite areas in San

Francisco, and was historically operated by Southern Pacific Railroad for freight train activity

into and out of San Francisco between 1914 and 1960. The majority of this area is now vacant

with remnant railroad buildings, such as the Roundhouse, remaining. Contaminants known to be

present in this area include volatile organic compounds (VOCs), metals, Bunker C oil (a fuel oil

used for locomotives), and total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH), a term used for any mixture of

hydrocarbons found in crude oil.

For purposes of regulatory oversight pertaining to site contamination and remediation, the

railyard is divided into two separate “Operable Units.” Operable Unit 1 (OU-1), in the northern

portion of the railyard, is under the jurisdiction of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC); Operable Unit 2 (OU-2), in the southern portion of the railyard, is under the

jurisdiction of the RWQCB. Potential remedial actions for these areas also are summarized in

Section 3.11 below. As noted below, the final remedy selection process for OU-1 and OU-2 is

under the jurisdiction of DTSC and the RWQCB, respectively, and would occur through

preparation and public review of separate Remedial Action Plans for each Operable Unit.

3.2.3 Existing Uses

Although the Project Site is largely undeveloped, existing uses include two lumberyards (Sierra

Point Lumber and Van Arsdale-Harris Lumber), the Brisbane Bayshore Industrial Park, Brisbane

Recycling Company (rock and concrete crushing operation), the Baylands Soil Processing

facility, and buildings associated with former railyard uses including the Roundhouse and the

Lazzari Fuel Company building, now used as a charcoal warehouse (see Figure 3-2). Other

existing uses within the Baylands include the Caltrain Bayshore Station, a solid waste transfer

facility operated by Recology, a horse boarding stable on the north slope of Icehouse Hill, and a

number of interim uses, which are described below.

As shown in Figure 3-2, the Kinder Morgan Energy Tank Farm, the Bayshore Sanitary District

pump station, and Machinery & Equipment, Inc., an equipment manufacturing/distribution

company, are immediately adjacent to or encompassed by the Project Site boundaries but are not

included as part of the Project Site development. These facilities will continue in their current

operations and are not a part of any of the Project Site development.

Former Railyard Buildings

Buildings associated with the former SPRR railyard uses that are located on the Project Site

include the Roundhouse and the Lazzari Fuel Company building. Designed by the SPRR and

constructed circa 1907, the Roundhouse remains a classic example of a railroad roundhouse,

despite being severely damaged by fire in recent years. Fire damage occurred primarily in the

western half of the Roundhouse, with portions of its roof now missing, charred timbers, and

missing or broken window frames. This abandoned building also shows evidence of vandalism and

graffiti, despite the chainlink fencing that encircles the building. Originally used to maintain and repair boilers on steam locomotives, the Lazzari Fuel Company building is located about 150 feet

northwest of the Roundhouse. This industrial building, designed by the SPRR and constructed in

1920, is currently used as a charcoal warehouse.

Lumberyards

The Sierra Point and Van Arsdale-Harris lumberyards are located on 8.6 acres at 601 and

595 Tunnel Avenue. The lumberyards provide retail and wholesale operations and receive

pre-formed lumber via truck and rail; no milling is done within the lumberyards. The lumberyards

currently include 142,500 square feet of building space, along with and outdoor lumber storage

areas.

Brisbane Bayshore Industrial Park

The Brisbane Bayshore Industrial Park is a multi-tenant industrial/warehouse complex with

approximately 231,400 square feet of building area. Existing businesses range from automotive

repairs, engineers, and landscapers to product distributors.

Recology

The 44.2-acre Recology site straddles the Brisbane/San Francisco boundary between US

Highway 101 and Tunnel Avenue. The facility provides landfill diversion and resource recovery

services to residential, commercial, and municipal customers in San Francisco.

There are approximately 20 existing buildings located on the site that contain administration,

operations, and maintenance functions for the facility; about half of these buildings are located

within the Brisbane city limits. These existing uses include 41,578 square feet of administrative

buildings, 78,168 square feet of operations area, and 113,142 square feet of vehicle and container maintenance facilities. Existing facilities also include a fleet of 558 vehicles. Operational

activities that occur on the site include waste transfer, materials recovery, public disposal and

recycling, vehicle weighing and maintenance, organics transfer, fueling, temporary hazardous

materials storage, fleet parking, cart and container maintenance and storage, and administrative

activities, which include a learning center, offices, and an artist-in-residence studio.

Many of the Recology buildings are more than 50 years old. Buildings in the southern portion of

the site were constructed on top of a solid waste landfill and have experienced significant

settlement. All infrastructure and utilities systems are currently in place; however, utilities at the site have failed repeatedly in recent years due to differential settlement and corrosion.

Caltrain Bayshore Station

The existing Caltrain Bayshore Station is located in the northwestern portion of the Project Site, north of Beatty Avenue. The station includes a pedestrian overpass with elevators, ticket

machines, and furnished waiting areas. It currently serves fewer than 300 average daily weekday

riders (138 outbound and 150 inbound in February 2011). A small parking lot provides about

40 spaces on the east side of the Bayshore Station and is well-used on typical weekdays.

During most weekday hours of operation, Caltrain service at the Bayshore Station consists of one

local train per hour in each direction.

Interim Uses

A number of interim uses have been established within the Baylands subject to Section 17.41 of

the Brisbane Municipal Code. Interim use permits are limited to a maximum initial term of

five years and can be extended in increments not exceeding five years.

Active interim use permits on the Project Site include the following:

•

Brisbane Recycling Company operates a rock and concrete crushing operation on

approximately 60 acres within the northern portion of the Project Site. Brisbane Recycling

Company shares a common point of access from Beatty Road with Brisbane Soil

Processing (described below), which has access through an internal road (approximately

1,700 linear feet) that runs through Brisbane Recycling Company’s operational area.

•

Baylands Soil Processing operates within the former landfill portion of the Project Site.

Since 1990, the City has authorized the importation of soil that was either used as stockpile

or processed for resale. Processing includes screening the soil to produce fill, sand, and top

soil. Incidental materials (e.g., concrete, asphalt, plants/wood, and brick) are removed

through the screening process, stockpiled, and eventually off-hauled. This operation

currently occupies approximately 174 acres.

•

Friends of San Bruno Mountain Greenhouse is a 4,000-square-foot greenhouse housing

a native plant nursery at 3435 Bayshore Boulevard, near Fire Station No. 51.

•

Tunnel Avenue Bus Yard is a bus storage and dispatch facility consisting of parking for

50 buses and an approximately 2,000-square-foot dispatch trailer on 2.3 acres at

575 Tunnel Avenue.

•

Outdoor storage for lumber and construction equipment parking has been approved on

approximately three acres on the west side of Tunnel Avenue, generally across from

Sierra Point Lumber.

•

A 55-foot-high Clear Channel billboard with two 23-foot-by-60-foot faces is located

approximately 100 feet south of Beatty Avenue at US Highway 101.

•

San Francisco Trains uses an existing 48-foot-by-100-foot concrete slab near the existing

Roundhouse for storage and rehabilitation of an historic railroad steam engine.

Temporary Uses

The City of Brisbane has also periodically allowed short-term temporary uses to occur within the

Baylands Subarea subject to the provisions of the Brisbane Municipal Code. These temporary

uses include special event parking for San Francisco 49ers home games and for the Grand

National Rodeo held at the Cow Palace in Daly City.

Lagoon and Other Natural Resources

Vegetation and the wildlife habitat it supports have been, and continue to be, highly disturbed on the vast majority of the Project Site. The Project Site is dominated by non-native ruderal and

grassland species, with landscaped areas containing non-native trees and shrubs also located in

several areas. Native vegetation types, including coastal scrub and perennial grasslands, are

confined to relatively small areas on Icehouse Hill, to the tidal and freshwater wetlands along the edges of drainage channels and Brisbane Lagoon, and to seasonal wetlands in the western portion

of the Project Site.

The Project Site encompasses the open water/estuarine communities of Brisbane Lagoon, which

is comprised of approximately 119 acres of open water subject to muted tidal influence. Brisbane

Lagoon is located at the southern end of the Project Site. The lagoon’s shorelines contain little

beach during high tides and most of the shoreline exposed during low tides is protected by riprap.

Small areas of mudflats are present along portions of the Bay shoreline and within the lagoon at

low tide. Brisbane Lagoon is tidally connected through two large concrete box culverts to San

Francisco Bay located just east of US Highway 101. These box culverts are 12 feet long by 12 feet

wide and are unobstructed for a length of 300 feet. Natural resources existing on the Project Site are described in greater detail in Chapter 4, Section 4.C, Biological Resources, of this EIR.

3.2.4 Existing Infrastructure and Services

Traffic and Circulation

Regional vehicle access to the Project Site is provided by three freeways: US Highway 101,

Interstate 280 (I-280), and Interstate 380 (I-380). Local access to the Project Site is provided by US Highway 101 and the following key arterial and collector streets within Brisbane and the

adjacent cities of San Francisco and Daly City:

•

Bayshore Boulevard, a four-lane arterial street that flanks the Project Site to the west

and parallels US Highway 101 between Caesar Chavez Boulevard in San Francisco and

South San Francisco, where it becomes Airport Boulevard;

•

Geneva Avenue, a four-lane east-west arterial street between I-280 (adjacent to the Balboa

Park Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station and the City College of San Francisco Phelan

Campus) and Bayshore Boulevard, where it currently terminates adjacent to the Project Site

without providing access into it;

•

Guadalupe Canyon Parkway, a four-lane east-west arterial street near the Project Site

that runs from Bayshore Boulevard over the hills to Daly City, where it becomes East

Market Street;

•

Valley Drive, a four-lane east-west collector street between Bayshore Boulevard and West

Hill Drive; and

•

Sunnydale Avenue, a two-lane east-west street north of Geneva Avenue that runs between

Bayshore Boulevard and Persia Avenue and provides access to the Visitacion Valley

neighborhood of San Francisco.

Existing roadways that provide internal circulation within the Project Site include the following

(see Figure 3-7):

•

Tunnel Avenue, a two-lane north-south collector street that connects to Bayshore

Boulevard at both ends and provides both vehicle access to and internal circulation within

the Project Site;

•

Beatty Avenue, a two-lane east-west collector street near the northern edge of the Project

Site;

•

Lagoon Way, a two-lane collector street that borders the lagoon in the southern portion of

the Project Site and runs east-west from Sierra Point Parkway to Tunnel Avenue; and

•

Sierra Point Parkway, a two-lane collector roadway running parallel to US Highway 101

and Bayshore Boulevard through the southeast portion of the Project Site.

Water and Wastewater Facilities

Water Facilities

Water service is provided to the Project Site by the City of Brisbane, which operates two separate water districts providing water to the local residents and businesses. The Brisbane Water District serves Central Brisbane, Sierra Point, and the Brisbane Baylands. The Guadalupe Valley

Municipal Improvement District (GVMID) serves Crocker Park and the Northeast Ridge

residential area.

Brisbane does not have its own groundwater or surface water supplies and therefore purchases

potable water from the SFPUC, which operates the water system for San Francisco. The SFPUC

provides water service to the existing Recology site, including the portion that is within Brisbane.

Existing Brisbane infrastructure serving the Project Site includes a 14-inch AC water line that

runs south of the northwestern corner of Bayshore Boulevard and Main Street and a 14-inch line

that connects to the 12-inch line at Bayshore Boulevard and Main Street and runs to Tunnel

Avenue in the southwestern corner of the site. There is also a 12-inch line at the intersection of Bayshore Boulevard and Old County Road at the southern portion of the site. GVMID has a

12-inch water line connected from the SFPUC meter facility on North Hill Drive near Guadalupe

Canyon Parkway to a location near the southwestern corner of the Project Site.

Other existing water facilities in the vicinity of the Project Site include the following:

•

The City of Daly City has a six-inch water line on MacDonald Avenue near the northwest

corner of the Project Site; and

•

The SFPUC has a 12-inch water line on Tunnel Avenue at the north end of the Project Site

that provides water service to customers in Brisbane.

Wastewater Facilities

Wastewater services within the Project Site are provided by the Bayshore Sanitary District (BSD)

for all upland areas of the Baylands north of Brisbane Lagoon, and by the City of Brisbane in the

area to the south (BSD, 2012). Both agencies maintain wastewater collection facilities and

contract with the SFPUC for wastewater treatment. The existing Recology site receives

wastewater services from the SFPUC.

Within the Baylands is a 0.1-acre sewer pump station known as the “Carlyle Pump Station” that

was built in 1972 and is operated by the BSD. The majority of the BSD's wastewater flows into

this station and is pumped to the SFPUC’s southeast treatment plant where it receives secondary

treatment. The station has a capacity to pump over five million gallons per day. Its current

average daily pump flows are 380,000 gallons during dry weather and 1.2 million gallons during

wet weather (BSD, 2012).

Existing wastewater flows from the Project Site are collected and conveyed for treatment at the

SFPUC’s Southeast Water Pollution Control Plant (SEP) through two connections to the existing

SFPUC 78-inch-diameter combined sewer transmission main (SFCS) located in Sunnydale

Avenue and underneath portions of the Recology facility. The SFCS facility collects stormwater

runoff and sewage flows.

Located in the Bayview District of southeastern San Francisco, the SEP is a 250-million-gallon-

per- day (MGD) pure-oxygen activated-sludge treatment facility that provides secondary treatment

and serves municipal and industrial customers on the east side of San Francisco, in Brisbane, and

within the BSD. The SEP was originally constructed in 1952 and has been expanded several times.

The SEP is part of San Francisco’s combined sewer system, which allows the collection and

treatment

of both wastewater and stormwater. The SEP does not currently have the capability to

produce recycled water.

Solid Waste Services

The South San Francisco Scavenger Company provides solid waste collection and recycling

services to the City of Brisbane. Waste is transported to the Blue Line Transfer Incorporated

Public Disposal and Recycling Facility for sorting and processing. The Blue Line facility is

located in the South San Francisco and has a permitted capacity of 2,400 tons of waste per day

and an average daily throughput of 1,200 tons per day (BKF, 2011).

In 2009, solid waste from Brisbane was sent to Forward Landfill, Inc. (San Joaquin County),

Guadalupe Sanitary Landfill (Santa Clara County), Newby Island Sanitary Landfill (Santa Clara

County), Ox Mountain Sanitary Landfill (San Mateo County), Recology Hay Road (Solano

County), Zanker Material Processing Facility (Santa Clara County), and Zanker Road Class III

Landfill (Santa Clara County) (BKF, 2011).

Fire Protection Services

Fire protection services at the Baylands are provided by the North County Fire Authority (NCFA).

The City of Brisbane entered into an agreement along with other neighboring communities to

form the NCFA, a Joint Powers Authority that provides fire protection, emergency medical, and

other hazardous assistance and public services to the communities of Brisbane, Daly City, and

Pacifica. The NCFA operates nine fire companies in eight fire stations throughout its 60-square-

mile service area. There are eight engines, and one aerial ladder. Brisbane funds one fire company (personnel and apparatus) and one fire station located within the City. There are a minimum of

three firefighters, including at least one paramedic, assigned to each engine and aerial ladder

truck. In addition, two battalion chiefs and one duty deputy fire chief are on-duty daily. Overall, the NCFA maintains

30 personnel on duty on a daily basis (NCFA, 2011). The closest fire station to the Project Site

is NCFA Fire Station No. 81, located at 3445 Bayshore Boulevard in Brisbane, outside and

immediately adjacent to the southwestern edge of the Project Site.

In 2010, severe mold was detected in this station building, and as a result, Fire Station No. 81

firefighters are being housed in adjacent semi-permanent trailers. The primary response area for

this station is Brisbane. The station is staffed by one three-person paramedic engine company

NCFA Fire Station No. 93, located at 464 Marin Street in Daly City, is approximately one mile

from the Project Site. This station is also staffed by a three-person paramedic engine company

(NCFA, 2011). NCFA Fire Station No. 92 is located on the west side of San Bruno Mountain,

approximately 2.5 miles from the Project Site.

The NCFA’s Fire Prevention Services Bureau seeks to ensure that all new buildings comply with

state and local building and fire code requirements. To enforce standards for features such as

sprinkler and fire alarm systems and emergency vehicle access, the Fire Prevention Services

Bureau conducts over 1,500 plan reviews and construction inspections annually. In addition to its

firefighting and emergency medical response capabilities, the NCFA, through its Special

Operations Division, trains for and responds to emergencies involving hazardous materials as

well as incidents involving cliff/high angle, water or trench rescue, urban search and rescue,

confined space, and structural collapse (NCFA, 2011).

Police Services

The Brisbane Police Department (BPD) provides security and police services within the Brisbane

city limits from its headquarters in City Hall, located less than 0.5 mile from the Project Site. The BPD is staffed with 11 sworn officers and two civilian personnel. Current patrol staffing consists of a single beat with a minimum of one sergeant or shift supervisor and at least one other officer per shift. The BPD maintains 13 vehicles: six patrol cars, two motorcycles, one pick-up truck,

two unmarked detective vehicles, one unmarked administration vehicle, and one full-size special

unit vehicle (Meisner, 2011).

Schools

The Brisbane Elementary School District (Brisbane ESD), the Bayshore Elementary School District

(Bayshore ESD), and the Jefferson Union High School District (JUHSD) provide grades K-12

public education to Brisbane residents. The Project Site is within the jurisdiction of Bayshore ESD

and JUHSD. The elementary school closest to the Project Site is Brisbane Elementary School

operated by Brisbane ESD and located at 500 San Bruno Avenue, less than one mile from the

Project Site. Panorama Elementary School, operated by Bayshore ESD and located at 25 Bellevue

Avenue in Daly City, is less than two miles west of the Project Site. Lipman Middle School

(within Brisbane ESD) and located at 1 Solano Street, is also less than one mile from the Project

Site. The two JUHSD schools closest to the Project Site are Jefferson High School, approximately

three miles west of the Project Site at 6996 Mission Street in Daly City, and Westmoor High

School, approximately four miles west of the Project Site at 131 Westmoor Avenue in Daly City.

3.3 Existing Project Site Land Ownership

As shown in Figure 3-8, UPC owns the vast majority of the upland (non-water) and lagoon

portions of the Project Site. The upland area of the Project Site consists of 21 San Mateo

County Assessor’s parcels and five San Francisco Assessor’s parcels. UPC also owns

approximately 75 acres within Brisbane Lagoon. The remaining lagoon acreage is owned by

the City of Brisbane and other private owners. The entire lagoon area is included within the

Project Site. The lagoon property is separated from UPC’s upland holdings by a 600-foot-wide

strip of lagoon shoreline owned by the State Lands Commission (see Figure 3-8).

The City of Brisbane owns the 60-foot-wide Lagoon Way right-of-way, which crosses the

southern end of the Brisbane Baylands between the existing Sierra Point Parkway freeway off-

ramp and Tunnel Avenue. In addition, the BSD holds a 60-foot-wide access (“roadway”)

easement that follows Tunnel Avenue south of the Sierra Point Lumber site, veering west before

reaching Visitacion Creek; this easement provides access to the BSD’s pump station. Union

Pacific holds a 30-foot-wide right-of-way parallel to and west of Tunnel Avenue near the Sierra

Point Lumber and Van Arsdale-Harris Lumber sites, which are owned by Sierra Point Lumber

and Van Arsdale-Harris Lumber, respectively. Additionally, a drainage easement follows the

existing drainage channel and a water line easement crosses the Brisbane Baylands and

terminates near the Kinder Morgan Energy Tank Farm (see Figure 3-8).

Recology owns the existing site of its operations, which is split between Brisbane and San

Francisco. The area proposed for Recology’s expansion under the CPP-V Concept Plan scenario

is currently owned by UPC, Van Arsdale-Harris Lumber, Sierra Point Lumber, and Papenhause.

3.4 Existing Land Use Regulations

The portion of the Project Site located within the Brisbane city limits is within the Baylands

Subarea, the Northeast Bayshore Subarea, and the Beatty Subarea, as designated in the City’s

1994 General Plan (see Figure 3-9) and is subject to the City’s development regulations. The Brisbane General Plan designates the various portions of the Project Site as follows:

•

Baylands Subarea - Planned Development-Trade Commercial;

•

Southerly Brisbane Lagoon area - Marsh/Lagoon/Bayfront;

•

Northeast Bayshore Subarea, a 15.5-acre strip of land along Bayshore Boulevard,

encompassing the Bayshore Industrial Park - Trade Commercial; and

•

Beatty Subarea, including the Recology waste recycling facility and a part of the former

landfill developed with office and warehouse buildings and storage yards - Heavy

Commercial.

The portion of the Recology site within San Francisco is governed by the San Francisco General

Plan, which designates the site as Light Industry.

Six zoning districts apply to the Project Site. The southern and eastern parts of the Project Site are zoned Marsh Lagoon Bayfront (MLB), and the northern and western parts are zoned

Commercial Mixed-Use (C-1). The Northeast Bayshore Subarea is zoned Manufacturing (M-1),

and the Beatty Subarea is zoned Heavy Commercial (C-3). That portion of the existing Recology

site located within San Francisco is zoned Light Industrial and Heavy Industrial (M-1 and M-2)

(see Figure 3-10).

3.5 Concept Plan Development Scenarios

As noted above, the Brisbane General Plan requires preparation of a “Concept Plan” for the

Baylands prior to or concurrent with a specific plan, which is to be approved prior to future

development within the Baylands Subarea.2 All relevant aspects of the Brisbane 1994 General

Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and other applicable land use regulations are discussed in more detail in

Chapter 4, Section 4.I, Land Use and Planning Policy, of this EIR.

Four Concept Plan development scenarios have been prepared for the Baylands and are addressed

in this EIR at an equal level of detail. These Concept Plan scenarios are:

•

Developer-Sponsored Plan (DSP)

•

Developer-Sponsored Plan – Entertainment Variant (DSP-V)

•

Community Proposed Plan (CPP)

•

Community Proposed Plan – Recology Expansion Variant (CPP-V)

2 Relevant General Plan policies carrying these requirements read as follows:

Policy 329: Prior to or in conjunction with the first Specific Plan for the Baylands subarea, a Concept Plan shall be submitted, which shows the disposition of the entire site. The Concept Plan shall include the following; 1. an overall conceptual plan, illustrative in nature, showing uses and locations by means of bubble and schematic diagrams with an accompanying text;

2. a general description of conceptual uses, densities, intensities and locations consistent with the adopted General Plan;

3. a listing of responsible State, Federal or local agencies which have jurisdiction over the development of the site in the manner contemplated by the Concept Plan and a description of the studies to be concluded and the issues to be resolved with such agencies.

Prior to or in conjunction with any subsequent Specific Plan, the applicant shall provide an updated Concept Plan for City consideration. The conceptual plan need not represent a commitment by the owner to any form of development. In no event shall a submitted Concept Plan be deemed an application for any form of development project approval under the City's subdivision or Zoning regulations.

Policy 329.1: Adopt one or more Specific Plans and accompanying environmental impact reports prior to any development of the subarea.

Policy 330: In any Specific Plan which may be prepared for less than the entire Baylands subarea, demonstrate the major circulation, open space and utilities for the remainder of the property.”

These Concept Plan scenarios provide four alternative concepts for the future use of the Project

Site, including a general description of proposed uses and their locations, density and intensity of proposed development, a listing of agencies with jurisdiction over Project Site development, and

a description of studies to be conducted and issues to be resolved with those agencies (see

General Plan Policy 329). The identification of agencies with jurisdiction over site development,

studies to be prepared, and issues to be resolved will, among other things, address the provision

of backbone roadways and other infrastructure to serve planned development of the Project Site.

The Concept Plan for each of the four scenarios is presented below. Summaries of land area types

proposed for development (Table 3-2A), proposed land use changes under each of the Concept

Plan scenarios (Table 3-2B), and proposed development by land use under each of the Concept Plan scenarios (Table 3-2C) are included below.

TABLE 3-2A

LAND AREA TYPES ON BRISBANE BAYLANDS PROJECT SITE

Developer-Sponsored Plan

Community Proposed Plan (CPP)

(DSP) and Variant (DSP-V)

and Variant (CPP-V)

Component

(acres)

(acres)

Project Site Area

Total Buildable Areaa

380.4

223.2

Existing Recology Site

0.0

44.2

Lagoon (including open water and perimeter)

135.6

135.6

Open Space

168.0

330.0

Total Site Area

684.0

733.0b

a The “buildable area” includes all planned development and associated area for streets and infrastructure.

b The total site area under the CPP and CPP-V includes the existing 44.2-acre Recology site plus adjacent roadway rights of way.

SOURCE: UPC, 2011; Dyett and Bhatia, 2011.

TABLE 3-2B

PROPOSED LAND USE CHANGES FOR BRISBANE BAYLANDS PROJECT SITE

Developer-Sponsored Plan

Community Proposed Plan

DSP

DSP-V

CPP

CPP-V

Component

(square feet)

(square feet)

(square feet)

(square feet)

Existing Development

Existing Industrial Park to be Removed

(231,400)

(231,400)

(231,400)

(231,400)

Existing Roundhouse and Lazzari Fuel Company

28,200

28,200

28,200

28,200

Existing Lumberyards to be Relocated

142,500

142,500

142,500

142,500

Existing Recology Use to Remain/(be Removed)

NA

NA

260,000

(174,000)a

Total Square Feet of Existing Uses

402,100

402,100

662,100

662,100

Total Square Feet of Existing Uses to Remain

170,700

170,700

430,700

256,700

Proposed New Development

Net New Residential Development

5,150,400

5,150,400

0

0

TABLE 3-2B (Continued)

PROPOSED LAND USE CHANGES FOR BRISBANE BAYLANDS PROJECT SITE

Developer-Sponsored Plan

Community Proposed Plan

DSP

DSP-V

CPP

CPP-V

Component

(square feet)

(square feet)

(square feet)

(square feet)

Proposed New Development (cont.)

Net New Non-Residential Development

6,945,900

6,899,000

7,742,600

8,072,600

Total Square Feet of New Development

12,096,300

12,049,400

7,742,600

8,072,600

Total Square Feet of Development at Buildoutb

12,267,000

12, 220,100

8,173,300

8,243,300

NA = not applicable

a Recology’s plan for facility redevelopment indicates that “most” (approximately 20) existing structures would be removed.

b This total represents the total square feet of new development plus the total square feet of existing uses that would be relocated.

SOURCE: UPC, 2011; Dyett and Bhatia, 2011.

TABLE 3-2C

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT FOR BRISBANE BAYLANDS PROJECT SITE BUILDABLE AREA

DSP

DSP-V

CPP

CPP-V

(square feet)

(square feet)

(square feet)

(square feet)

Residential

5,150,400

5,150,400

0

0

Residential Flats

4,351,800

(3,950 units)

4,351,800

-

-

(3,950 units)

Residential Townhomes

798,600

(484 units)

798,600

-

-

(484 units)

Hotels and Conference

261,100

586,800

1,392,300

1,046,100

Hotels and Conference

261,100

(369 rooms)

586,800

1,392,300

1,046,100

(719 rooms)

(1,990 rooms)

(1,500 rooms)

Retail and Mixed Use

566,300

283,400

2,209,500

2,209,500

Retail

566,300

283,400

-

-

Commercial/Office/R&D

-

-

2,209,500

2,209,500

Research and Development Single Use

3,328,300

2,599,200

2,007,000

1,672,200

Research and Development

3,328,300

2,599,200

2,007,000

1,672,200

Office and Institutional

2,762,000

2,363,100

992,700

992,700

Office

2,651,200

2,252,300

-

-

Institutional

110,800

110,800

-

-

Office/ Institutional Mixed

-

-

992,700

992,700

Entertainment/Civic/Cultural

28,200

1,066,500

1,074,500

1,074,500

Arena

-

630,100

-

-

Theater/ Exhibition/Performance Venue

-

337,200

274,500

274,500

Multiplex

-

71,000

-

-

Cultural/Entertainment

-

-

611,300

611,300

Civic/ Cultural

28,200

28,200

188,700

188,700

Industrial

142,500

142,500

469,100

1,220,100

Existing Relocated Industrial

142,500

142,500

142,500

142,500

New Industrial

-

-

66,600

66,600

Existing Resource and Recovery

-

-

260,000

-

Expanded/Rebuilt Resource and Recovery

-

-

-

1,011,000

Total

12,238,800

12,191,900

8,145,100

8,215,100

NOTE: See Table 3-2A for description of “buildable area.”

SOURCE: UPC, 2011; Dyett and Bhatia, 2011.

3.5.1 Developer-Sponsored Plan (DSP)

In 2011, UPC submitted a Specific Plan that includes two Concept Plan scenarios offering a

vision for Project Site development (see Appendix C for a full copy of the draft Specific Plan).3

The two Concept Plan scenarios set forth in the Specific Plan are referred to in this EIR as the

“Developer-Sponsored Plan” (DSP) and the “Developer-Sponsored Plan – Entertainment

Variant” (DSP-V). The DSP Concept Plan scenario is described below and the DSP-V Concept

Plan scenario is described in Section 3.5.2. Because the DSP and DSP-V are both included in the

Specific Plan proposed by UPC, many of the uses, standards, and improvements in those two

Concept Plan scenarios are the same or similar. This EIR identifies the provisions of the DSP and

DSP-V that differ and does not repeat the same discussion for both scenarios.

The DSP provides for development of 4,434 dwelling units and 6,945,900 square feet of new

non-residential uses on 684 acres of the Project Site (see Figure 3-11). Also included in the DSP

are relocation of 142,500 square feet of existing lumberyards and reuse of the existing

Roundhouse and Lazzari Fuel Company buildings. The DSP also proposes that new, higher

density development replace the existing 231,400-square-foot Brisbane Bayshore Industrial Park

(see Figure 3-2). The DSP does not include the existing 44.2-acre area encompassing the

Recology site and adjacent road rights-of-way.

Proposed Land Uses

The DSP includes residential, retail, office, campus research and development, public/civic/

cultural center, institutional, industrial/warehouse, and open space land uses. To promote transit accessibility, the DSP proposes higher intensity uses in proximity to transit stops. Under the DSP, and as noted in Table 3-1B, the existing lumberyards would be relocated to a site within the

Project Site boundary. The remains of the Roundhouse building would be renovated as part of a

public use/civic/cultural center, and the Lazzari Fuel Company building would be incorporated

into the research and development uses proposed for the area.

Land Use Designations

Land use designations proposed by the DSP are shown in Figure 3-11. The corresponding land

use designations listed below delineate the type and range of land uses, minimum and

maximum floor area ratios (FARs), and maximum allowable heights. Associated overlay

designations delineate additional development standards and uses that may be located within

underlying designations as well as specific limitations on site coverage and maximum allowable

heights.

3 The Draft Brisbane Baylands Specific Plan proposed by UPC is described in greater detail in Section 3.7 and is also available online at: http://www

. ci . bris b ane

.ca . us/department s /building-and-planning/ba

y land s -specific-plan

.

Residential Uses

•

Flats. This designation is primarily intended for multi-family residential development, such as stacked flats, multi-family apartments, townhomes, and duplexes. Also included within

this designation are accessory commercial, office, entertainment, visitor-serving,

public/semi-public, and other similar uses primarily in ground floor locations. Two

designations of Flats are proposed: High Density (60 to 95 dwelling units per acre) and

Medium Density (45 to 70 dwelling units per acre).

•

Townhomes. This designation is also primarily intended for multi-family residential

development, such as stacked flats, multi-family apartments, townhomes, and duplexes. It is

distinguished from the Flats land use designation in that single-family attached dwelling

units are permitted and that single-family detached dwelling units could also be approved

within areas designated Townhomes. Also included within this designation are accessory

commercial, office, entertainment, visitor-serving, public/semi-public, and other similar uses

in ground floor locations. Two Townhomes designations are proposed: High Density (25 to

35 dwelling units per acre) and Medium Density (20 to 30 dwelling units per acre).

Commercial Uses

•

Retail. This designation provides for the shopping and general commercial needs of the

community and includes a wide range of retail, commercial service, entertainment, visitor-

serving, public/semi-public, and other similar uses. This designation also provides for

approval of more intensive commercial and entertainment uses, such as home

improvement centers, theaters, and hotels, as well as research and development facilities.

Two types of retail areas are proposed: (1) one- to two-story single-use retail, and (2) more

intensive retail use (two to three stories) at Geneva Avenue adjacent to the transit station

area.

•

High-Rise Office. This designation is intended to provide for office-based employment

opportunities in a high-intensity setting (six- to nine-story buildings). Also permitted are

a range of retail, commercial service, entertainment, visitor-serving, public/semi-public,

and other similar uses, primarily in ground floor locations. Some of the more intensive

commercial and entertainment uses, such as exhibition/convention centers, as well as

research and development may also be permitted.

•

Mid-Rise Office. This designation is intended to provide for office-based employment

opportunities in a less intensive setting (up to five-story buildings) than High-Rise Office.

Also permitted are a range of retail, commercial service, entertainment, visitor-serving,

public/semi-public, and other similar uses, primarily in ground floor locations. Some of the

more intensive commercial and entertainment uses, such as exhibition/convention centers,

as well as research and development may also be permitted.

•

Office R&D-1. This designation is intended for the development of a mix of office,

research and development, and supporting service uses in a high-intensity, transit-oriented

setting.

•

Office R&D-2. This designation is intended for the development of a mix of office, research and development, light industrial, and supporting service uses in a lower intensity,

suburban setting.

•

Hotels and Conference. This designation is intended for the development of visitor-

serving uses, including hotels, conference facilities, and similar uses.

•

Ground Floor Retail Below Other Use. This overlay designation is used to denote

locations where retail uses are permitted on the ground floor of lands designated for other

uses, such as residential.

Industrial Uses

•

Light Industrial. This designation is intended for the development of light industrial uses involved in production, research and development, warehousing, and wholesaling, as well

as limited support uses.

•

Renewable Energy Generation. This designation is intended for the production

of renewable energy resources and compatible recreational uses.

•

Renewable Energy Generation/Open Space Reserve. This designation is also intended

for the production of renewable energy resources and compatible recreational uses, and

serves as a buffer area between proposed renewable energy facilities and planned open

space areas.

•

Recycled Water Plant. This designation is intended for the development of a recycled

water plant for the Baylands capable of producing recycled water supplies for non-potable

irrigation use within the Baylands.

Institutional Uses

•

Institutional. This designation provides for the range of public, semi-public,

governmental, and institutional uses needed to support other uses proposed for the

Baylands.

Open Space Uses

•

Open Space. This designation provides for a range of recreational, educational,

and environmental protection uses.

Development Intensity

Proposed uses development intensity for uses proposed under the DSP are shown in Table 3-3

below (the information in Table 3-3 is also applicable to the DSP-V).

Agencies with Jurisdiction over Site Development, Studies to be

Conducted, and Issues to be Resolved

As required by the Brisbane General Plan, a Concept Plan for Baylands development must

include “a listing of responsible State, Federal or local agencies which have jurisdiction over the development of the site in the manner contemplated by the Concept Plan and a description of the

studies to be concluded and the issues to be resolved with such agencies.” The jurisdictions

having authority over various aspects of Baylands development and the issues that that need to be

resolved with those agencies include the following:

•

A Landfill Closure Permit, Landfill Closure Plan, and Post-Closure Maintenance Plan

require approval by the State Water Resources Control Board, Bay Area Air Quality

Management District (BAAQMD), and CalRecycle/ Environmental Health Division, San

Mateo County Health Services Agency. The requisite studies needed for closure of the

landfill in a manner that would permit future use of the area as proposed in this Concept

Plan have been prepared as part of the Specific Plan. Still to be resolved are specific

methods that will be employed to cap and close the landfill and for methane control.

•

A Remedial Action Plan and Remedial Design and Implementation Plan for OU-1 and OU-

2 require approval by DTSC and RWQCB, respectively. While many of the studies needing

to be conducted to support preparation of the Remedial Action Plans and Remedial

TABLE 3-3

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY (FOR BOTH DSP AND DSP-V)

Building Density

(dwelling units

Floor Area Ratio

Land Use

Building Height (feet and/or stories)

per net acre)

(FAR)a

Residential Flats-High Density

45 feet to 70 feet typical range

60 to 95

2.0 to 4.0

Up to 90 feet at four tower locations along Geneva Avenue and 2nd Street

Up to 125 feet at two tower locations along Geneva Avenue between 5th Street and Caltrain

right-of-way

Residential Flats-Medium Density

45 feet to 70 feet typical range

45 to 70

2.0 to 3.5

Townhomes-High Density

2-1/2 to 3-1/2 stories (up to 35 feet)

25 to 35

0.8 to 2.0

Townhomes-Medium Density

2 to 3-1/2 stories (up to 35 feet)

20 to 30

0.7 to 2.0

Single-Use Retail

1 to 2 stories (45 feet)

NA

0.4 to 1.25

Retail

2 to 3 stories (up to 60 feet), at Geneva Avenue adjacent to the transit station area

NA

0.4 to 1.25

High-Rise Office

6 to 9 stories (up to 125 feet)

NA

2.25 to 3.50

Mid-Rise Office

4 to 5 stories (up to 70 feet)

NA

2.0 to 3.0

Hotels and Conference

12 to 16 stories (160 feet)

NA

2.0 to 5.50

Office R&D-1 (TOD)

Up to 5 stories (up to 70 feet), and 6 stories (up to 85 feet) with variance

NA

0.6 to 2.0

Office R&D-2 (Suburban)

1 to 3 stories (25 to 45 feet)

NA

0.6 to 2.0

Multiplex

Up to 90 feet

NA

0.4 to 1.25

(DSP-V only)

Theater

90 feet in front; up to 125 feet after stepback

NA

1.0 to 3.0

(DSP-V only)

Arena

90 feet in front; up to 150 feet after stepback

NA

1.0 to 2.5

(DSP-V only)

Light Industrial (including water

1 story (up to 25 feet)

NA

NA

recycling facility)

Industrial-Renewable Energy

NA

NA

NA

Generation

Institutional

1 to 3 stories (up to 45 feet)

NA

0.3 to 1.0

a The floor area ratio (FAR) is the ratio of the total floor area of buildings at a certain location to the size of the land at that location, or the limit imposed on such a ratio. As a formula: floor area ratio =

(total covered area on all floors of all buildings on a certain plot)/(area of the plot). Thus, an FAR of 2.0 would indicate that the total floor area of a building is two times the gross area of the plot on which it is constructed. An FAR of 2.0 is typically found in a multiple-story building.

NA = not applicable

SOURCE: UPC, Draft Brisbane Baylands Specific Plan, 2011.

Design and Implementation Plans have been prepared as part of the Project Site

development, the actual plans still require preparation and final approval prior to any

ground-disturbing activities within the two Operable Units. Issues to be resolved include

the specific remediation methods to be employed on a site-specific basis within the two

Operable Units.

•

Following certification of this EIR, implementation of the proposed water transfer / supply

agreement will require approvals of final Water Supply and Conveyance Agreements

between Brisbane and OID, between Brisbane and the Modesto Irrigation District (MID),

and Brisbane and SFPUC for individual portions of the proposed water transfer. There are

no known issues other than certification of this EIR to address the environmental impacts

of the water transfers that will implement the agreements that require resolution.

•

Interagency Cooperation Agreements will be needed to coordinate and implement public

facilities and infrastructure improvements with various agencies, as follows:

-

City and County of San Francisco.



Specific roadway alignments and transit facilities improvements will need to be

designed and approved;



Design of sewer and water supply infrastructure improvements connecting the

Baylands to the SFPUC’s sewer system via BSD.



Design of water infrastructure improvements connecting the Baylands to the

SFPUC supply via the City of Brisbane.

-

BSD. In addition to an onsite recycled water plant, specific recycled water supply

improvements will need to be designed and approved.

-

City of Daly City. Specific improvements will need to be designed and approved for

the new Bayshore Boulevard/Geneva Avenue intersection.

-

NCFA. Expansion of fire facilities will be necessary to implement the fire service

performance standards of the NCFA as set forth in this EIR to provide adequate fire

protection to support development of the Baylands. This may require a review of

services and fire service demands for the NCFA’s overall service area to determine

the best method of meeting applicable fire service performance standards.

-

San Francisco County Transportation Authority. Engineering and architectural

studies, as well as funding agreements, will be required to define specific

transportation corridor alignments and transit facilities improvements.

-

San Mateo County Congestion Management Agency. Engineering and architectural

studies will be required to define specific designs for regional transportation facilities

and roadway improvements.

•

San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) design review

and permit approvals will be required for development within the 100-foot shoreline band.

The lagoon and Visitacion Creek are both subject to tidal action from San Francisco Bay.

Any development that occurs within the 100-foot shoreline band of these features requires

BCDC review. Engineering and architectural design studies for any development proposed

within this 100-foot shoreline band will be required.

•

One or more Streambed Alteration Agreement(s) may be required from the California

Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and Section 404 permit(s) from the United States

Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) may be required for activities in or around Visitacion

Creek as part of the landfill closure requirements of the RWQCB. Design studies to

determine whether such agreements will be needed and to support permit requests if they

are, in fact needed, will be required. Issues to be resolved include the extent to which such

permits, if any, will be required, and what conditions may be imposed under such required

permits.

•

Water quality certification pursuant to the provisions of the National Pollutant Discharge

Elimination System (NPDES), along with waste discharge requirement compliance from

the RWQCB, will be needed. Final grading plans and specific methods of preventing

erosion will be required prior to issuance of such a permit. Receiving waste discharge

requirements from the RWQCB will require completion of engineering studies for the

recycled water plant proposed within the Baylands.

•

To receive applicable air quality permits from the BAAQMD, specific engineering designs

for uses/activities requiring such permits must first occur.

•

Issuance of an Incidental Take Permit, if necessary, for special-status species from CDFW

will require completion of specific engineering designs for site-specific development and

infrastructure to determine whether such permits would, in fact, be required.

•

State Lands Commission approvals, if necessary. Portions of the proposed Project that

occupy filled and unfilled tidelands and submerged lands sold into private ownership by the

State Lands Commission, and that remain submerged or subject to tidal action, are subject

to a Public Trust easement retained by the state. Any portion of the Project Site

development located within the Guadalupe Canal would require a lease from the State

Lands Commission. Site-specific engineering designs for development and infrastructure

within the Baylands would be required prior to determining whether any State Lands

Commission approvals are, in fact, necessary.

•

California Public Utilities Commission approval will be required for a railroad grade

separation along the proposed Geneva Avenue extension. Specific engineering designs to

determine the alignment and grade of the Geneva Avenue extension will be required prior

to California Public Utilities Commission approval.

•

Encroachment permits will be required if construction occurs in right-of-way owned by the

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans District 4) or the Peninsula Corridor

Joint Powers Board (Caltrain). Site-specific engineering designs for development and

infrastructure within the Baylands would be required prior to determining whether any

encroachment permits were, in fact, necessary

•

The Bayshore ESD will have jurisdiction over design and construction of Kindergarten

through eighth grade school facilities needed to house students from the Baylands.

Construction of grade 9-12 school facilities needed to house students from the Baylands

will be under the jurisdiction of the JUHSD. Specific siting studies for proposed school

facilities within the Project Site will need to be undertaken in relation to site remediation

and noise conditions prior to acquiring land for school facilities. Also, should proposed

residential development within the Project Site generate a greater number of students than

can be housed within school facilities proposed for the Baylands, it will be the

responsibility of the Bayshore ESD and/or JUHSD to identify, acquire sites for, and design

required school facilities.

3.5.2 DSP – Entertainment Variant (DSP-V)

The DSP-V incorporates an intensified entertainment district into the DSP land use plan and the

associated development standards. The proposed type and pattern of land uses, as well as the

overall development intensity under the DSP-V are the same as proposed under the DSP, with the

exception that the DSP-V replaces some of the Retail and Office R&D-1 uses proposed under the

DSP with entertainment-oriented land use designations (“Theater,” “Multiplex,” “Arena,” “Hotels

& Conference”) in the northeast portion of the Project Site, north of the proposed Roundhouse

Avenue (see Figure 3-12) and increases in hotel use.

The DSP-V Concept Plan scenario provides for 4,434 dwelling units and 6,899,027 square feet of

new non-residential development. Like the DSP, the DSP-V scenario include relocation of the

existing lumberyards and adaptive reuse of the Roundhouse and Lazzari Fuel Company buildings,

as indicated in Table 3-2B. The DSP-V scenario does not include the existing 44.2-acre Recology

site or adjacent roadway rights-of-way.

Proposed Land Uses

As noted above, the DSP-V differs from the DSP in that it provides for approximately one

million square feet of destination-oriented entertainment uses, including a 630,100-square-foot,

17,000- to

20,000-seat sports arena; a 337,200-square-foot, 5,500-seat concert theater; and a 71,000-square-

foot multiplex cinema in the northeastern portion of the Project Site. The DSP-V also includes

approximately 325,700 square feet more hotel and conference space than is proposed under the

DSP. A corresponding reduction in retail, office, and research and development uses would occur

to allow these entertainment-related land uses. All other components of the DSP-V remain the

same as those described above for the DSP. Land uses proposed under the DSP-V are summarized

in Table 3-2C. All uses shown in Table 3-3 for the DSP also would be allowable under the DSP-V.

Land Use Designations

The DSP-V Concept Plan scenario includes the same land use designations as the DSP scenario,

while adding the following designations.

Commercial Uses

•

Arena. This designation is intended to provide for development of a 630,100-square-foot,

17,000- to 20,000-seat sports arena, along with complementary commercial, public and

semi-public, hotel and visitor-serving, and entertainment uses.

•

Theater/Multiplex. The primary purpose of this land use designation is to provide for

development of 337,000-square-foot 5,500-seat concert venue and a 71,000-square-foot

multiplex cinema, along with complementary commercial, public and semi-public, hotel

and visitor-serving, and entertainment uses.

Development Intensity

Proposed development intensity standards for the entertainment-oriented land use designations

proposed under the DSP-V, as shown in Table 3-3, would be as follows:

•

Multiplex: floor area ratio ranging from 0.4 to 1.25, with a maximum building height of

90 feet and parking below and/or behind the parcel in structured parking;

•

Theater: floor area ratio ranging from 1.0 to 3.0 with a maximum building height of

90 feet within the front 20 feet of the building and up to 125 feet after the front stepback;

and

•

Arena: floor area ratio ranging from 1.0 to 2.5 with a maximum building height of 90 feet

within the front 20 feet of the structure and up to 150 feet after the front stepback.

All other development intensitiesfor the DSP-V are proposed to be the same as for the DSP.

Agencies with Jurisdiction over Site Development, Studies to be

Conducted, and Issues to be Resolved

The agencies with jurisdiction over site development, studies to be conducted, and issues to be

resolved with those agencies for the DSP-V Concept Plan scenario are the same as those for the

DSP scenario.

3.5.3 Community Proposed Plan (CPP)

In July 2009, the Brisbane City Council directed inclusion of the Community Proposed Plan

(CPP) in the EIR analysis of Baylands development. The CPP was developed over the course of

three years (2007 through 2009) based upon a series of community workshops, input from

community groups and city advisory commissions, and ideas from notable professionals provided

during a community speaker series. The speaker series covered topics such as sustainable cities,

renewable energy, and transit-oriented developments. Through this process, a variety of land use

issues were considered before the CPP was selected for study.

The CPP, which is intended to meet the requirements for a Concept Plan as set forth in the

Brisbane General Plan, consists of a conceptual land use plan, including proposed uses and

associated development standards, as well as discussion of agencies with jurisdiction over site

development

and issues to be resolved with those agencies. As described below, the CPP also includes an

overall circulation and infrastructure plan that would support development of the Baylands (see

Section

3.8.2 below). Like any of the proposed Concept Plan scenarios, implementation of the CPP

would require preparation and adoption of one or more specific plans, along with amendments to

the City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, as needed, to ensure the consistency of proposed

land uses and development standards with the City’s governing policy documents. However,

unlike the DSP and DSP-V Concept Plan scenarios for which a Specific Plan has been prepared,

only the Concept Plan for the CPP is being proposed at this time. If the CPP Concept Plan

scenario were to be selected by the City Council, preparation and approval of one or more

specific plans consistent with the selected Concept Plan would be required prior to site

development.

As shown in Table 3-1C above, the CPP includes 7,742,600 square feet of new non-residential

development. No residential development is proposed in the CPP. The CPP includes the existing

44.2-acre Recology facility. The CPP emphasizes maximizing the quality of public space and

concentrating development near transit. Under the CPP, almost all of the land area south of

Visitacion Creek would be designated for passive open space and active recreational use (see

Figure 3-13).

Proposed Land Uses

Land uses proposed by the CPP include commercial, office, R&D, hotel/conference center,

entertainment/cultural, civic, industrial, institutional, and public open space. Generally, the

northwestern part of the Project Site would have the most intense uses, with development

intensity decreasing to the east and south, with even less intensity in the southern area from about Visitacion Creek to the lagoon (see Figure 3-13). The relocation of existing lumberyards,

adaptive reuse of the Roundhouse and Lazzari Fuel Company buildings, and removal of the

existing

231,400-square-foot Brisbane Bayshore Industrial Park would be the same as under the DSP.

Table 3-2C presents a summary of the proposed land uses; allowable land uses are described below.

Land Use Designations

Land use designations proposed by the CPP are shown in Figure 3-13. The corresponding

descriptions listed below delineate the type and range of land uses, minimum and maximum

FARs, and maximum allowable heights. Associated overlay designations delineate additional

development standards and allowable uses within underlying designations as well as specific

limitations on site coverage and maximum allowable heights.

Land Use Designations

•

Mixed Commercial/Office/R&D. This designation is intended to encourage, support,

and enhance the immediate multimodal transit hub area as a high-intensity employment

center. Allowed uses include office, institutional, retail, and hotel developments.

•

Resource Recovery. This designation is intended for resource recovery and solid

waste management activities, including the Recology site.

•

Cultural/Entertainment. This designation allows a wide range of commercial, cultural,

and entertainment uses within an urban, pedestrian-oriented scale. The district is anchored

by a “main street” with active uses required along the ground floor. Active uses may

include stores, eating and drinking establishments, entertainment venues such as theaters,

and cultural institutions like museums or performance spaces.

•

Hotel. This designation permits hotels, with retail uses permitted as ancillary uses only.

•

Regional Exhibition/Performance Venue. This designation provides for a regional

destination that could include exhibit, convention, and performance spaces, such as

concert halls and auditoriums.

•

Office/Institutional. This designation provides for administrative, financial, business,

professional, medical, institutional, and public office spaces. Public service institutions such

as police and fire stations would be included under this designation.

•

Research & Development (R&D). This designation allows for research and development

facilities, as well as supporting office spaces. Warehousing and distribution facilities are

permitted as ancillary uses only.

•

Industrial. This designation is intended for a range of industrial uses, such as light

manufacturing and the existing lumberyards that would be relocated within the Project

Site.

•

Civic/Cultural/Public Facilities. This designation is intended for civic and cultural uses

open to the public, as well as other public facilities. It may include reuse or preservation of

historic buildings, as well as venues for public gathering, learning, or performance, such as

community centers, educational/ learning centers, or theaters. The proposed recycled water

plant also is included under this designation.

•

Public Use Envelope. This designation represents locations where active and recreational

public uses are appropriate. Uses could include commercial recreational facilities, schools,

interpretative centers, parks and play areas, and gathering spaces. Three subareas are

identified within this envelope:

-

Group Area. This sub-district allows open space and revenue-generating picnic and

event facilities oriented to the Brisbane residential and employment community.

-

Charter High School/Community Use Area. This sub-district allows open space;

community-oriented recreation facilities, including gym and soccer fields; adult

education in art and sustainable related jobs; and a potential charter high school.

-

Regional Use/Park Concession Area. This sub-district allows open space and

revenue-generating regional facilities such as bicycle training areas or a golf training

facility, along with supporting services and amenities.

•

Parks/Plazas. This designation allows park and plaza uses within a developed setting,

providing open space for employees and visitors and a central focus for businesses and

retail/pedestrian-oriented development.

•

Public/Open Space/Open Space Connection/Wetlands. These designations

accommodate natural habitat, wetlands, recreational fields, and open space areas for the

general community. Natural habitat and wetlands would have continuous connections

through this area. Recreational uses could include bicycle rentals near multiuse trails and

kayak rentals near the lagoon area.

Overlay Designations

•

Hotel/Extended Stay Overlay. This overlay allows hotel uses including short- and

extended-stay facilities in addition to uses allowed with the underlying base designation.

Minimum and maximum FARs and maximum building height are the same as those in the

underlying land use designation on which the overlay is applied.

•

Public Space-Oriented Overlay. Development within this overlay would be integrated

with open space, with connections to adjacent natural and public open space areas. This

overlay requires 50 percent of the site area to be public open space. Open space would be

connected to provide continuity of natural areas throughout the overlay designation.

Development Intensity

As indicated in Table 3-4, which summarizes proposed development intensity for the CPP and

CPP-V, building heights would not exceed 160 feet, or approximately 16 stories. FARs would

range from 0.1 to 3.5.

TABLE 3-4

COMMUNITY PROPOSED PLAN (CPP) AND VARIANT (CPP-V):

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Maximum Building

Proposed Land Use

Minimum FARa

Maximum FARa

Height (feet)

Mixed Use

1.00

3.50

160

Cultural/Entertainment

0.40

2.50

55 b

Hotelc

1.00

2.50

120

Regional Exhibition/Performance Venue

0.50

1.50

120

Office/Institutional

0.50

1.75

80

Research & Developmentd

0.50

1.75

80

Industrial

-

1.00

35

Civic/Culturalb

-

0.75

55

Resource Recovery

-

1.00

105

Parks/Plazas

-

0.10

25

Public/Open Space

-

-

-

Wetlands

-

-

-

Public Use Envelope

Group Area

-

0.10

25

Charter High School/Community Use Area

-

0.50

55

Regional Use/Park Concession Area d

-

0.10

25

a The floor area ratio (FAR) is the ratio of the total floor area of buildings on a site to the site area. As a formula: FAR = (total covered area on all floors of al buildings)/(site area). Thus, a four-story building covering half of a site would have an FAR of 2.0.

b Cultural/Entertainment land use in the Lagoon Park Concession area is within a Public Space-Oriented Overlay designation; development is restricted to maximum building heights of 25 feet (FAR = 1.0).

c Areas within the Hotel/Extended Stay Overlay designation allow hotel uses including short- and extended-stay facilities in addition to uses allowed by the underlying land use designation. Minimum and maximum FARs and maximum building height are the same as those allowed by the underlying land use designation on which the overlay is applied.

d Development within Public Space-Oriented Overlay designations would be integrated with open space, with connections to adjacent natural and public open space areas. This overlay requires 50 percent of the site area to be public open space. Open space would be connected to provide continuity of natural areas throughout the overlay designation. Maximum building height within this overlay is 55 feet, with the exception of the Lagoon Park Concession area, where maximum building height is 25 feet.

SOURCE: Dyett & Bhatia, 2011.

Agencies with Jurisdiction over Site Development, Studies to be

Conducted, and Issues to be Resolved

The agencies with jurisdiction over site development, studies to be conducted, and issues to be

resolved with those agencies for the CPP Concept Plan scenario are similar to those for the DSP

scenario, with the exception of studies for preparation of a specific plan, as well as school district jurisdiction and issues, as follows:

•

Prior to site development pursuant to the CPP Concept Plan scenario, a specific plan would

need to be prepared for review and approval by the City of Brisbane. The specific plan

would include engineering and design studies needed to determine the proposed location

and size of project infrastructure to serve proposed development. The analysis set forth in

this EIR provides essential information needed for such engineering and design studies

including traffic analyses needed for engineering of proposed circulation facilities, and

analyses of water demand, sewage generation, and energy consumption needed for

engineering design of water, sewer, and energy systems for the CPP Concept Plan scenario.

•

Design and construction of the proposed grade 9-12 charter school is under the jurisdiction

of JUHSD. Prior to acquiring land for the school, specific siting studies for the proposed

school facility within the Baylands will need to be undertaken to evaluate site remediation

and noise conditions.

3.5.4 CPP – Recology Expansion Variant (CPP-V)

The CPP-V Concept Plan scenario provides for the expansion of the existing Recology facility

within the northeast portion of the Project Site, substituting additional Recology facilities for the hotel and R&D uses proposed for that area under the CPP (see Figure 3-14). Excepting the area proposed for the Recology expansion, land uses for the remainder of the Project Site are proposed

to be the same under the CPP-V scenario as under the CPP scenario. A detailed site plan for the

proposed Recology expansion is shown in Figure 3-15. As with the other three Concept Plan

scenarios, relocation of existing lumberyards, adaptive reuse of the Roundhouse and Lazzari Fuel

Company buildings, and removal of the existing 231,400-square-foot Brisbane Bayshore

Industrial Park would occur (see Figure 3-16 below).

Under the CPP-V scenario, total proposed new development would be 8,072,600 square feet. As

under the CPP scenario, energy generation components would be incorporated into building

design and elsewhere on site as appropriate. Including existing lumberyard uses to be relocated,

total square feet of development at buildout would be 8,215,100 square feet.

As with the CPP scenario, no residential development is included in the CPP-V scenario. Also,

as with any of the proposed Concept Plan scenarios, implementation of the CPP-V would require

preparation and adoption of one or more specific plans, along with amendments to the City’s

General Plan and Zoning Ordinance to ensure the consistency of proposed land uses and

development standards with the City’s governing policy documents. However, unlike the DSP

and DSP-V scenarios, the CPP-V scenario includes only the Concept Plan at this time. If the

CPP-V Concept Plan scenario were to be selected by the City Council, preparation and approval

of one or more specific plans consistent with the selected Concept Plan would be required prior

to site development.

Permitted Uses

The CPP-V Concept Plan scenario differs from the CPP scenario in that it proposes expansion of

the existing 44.2-acre Recology site by 21.3 acres to 65.5 acres, consolidating existing offsite

recycling and corporation yard facilities into one location. The total square footage of the

developed areas on the expanded Recology site would increase from the existing 260,000 square

feet to 1,011,000 square feet. To accommodate the additional acreage devoted to resource

recovery purposes, the R&D and Hotel designations proposed under the CPP scenario would be

eliminated from the northeastern portion of the Project Site as follows (see Table 3-1C):

•

Research & Development: Reduction of 334,800 square feet

•

Hotel/Extended Stay: Reduction of 346,200 square feet (490 rooms)

All other land uses proposed under the CPP-V would be the same as proposed under the CPP.

Development Intensity

Development intensity applicable to land uses under the CPP-V would be the same as described

for the CPP (see Table 3-4), but with the addition of development standards unique to the portion

of the Recology site that is within San Francisco. Development within San Francisco would be

consistent with the requirements of the San Francisco Planning Code for Light Industrial (M-1)

and Heavy Industrial (M-2) uses.

Agencies with Jurisdiction over Site Development, Studies to be

Conducted, and Issues to be Resolved

The agencies with jurisdiction over site development, studies to be conducted, and issues to be

resolved with those agencies for the CPP-V Concept Plan scenario are similar to those for the

CPP scenario, with the exception of the requirement that any changes to the Recology facility

within San Francisco will be subject to review and approval by the City and County of San

Francisco, and expansion of the Recology operations may require approvals from CalRecycle

and/or BAAQMD.

3.5.5 Recology Expansion

The proposed expanded Recology site is located to the west of US Highway 101 at the

Candlestick Point exit. It spans from San Francisco on the north, across the San Mateo County

line, into Brisbane on the south.

The proposed Recology expansion would also involve a comprehensive redevelopment of the

existing facility and is intended to provide updated infrastructure for managing San Francisco’s

solid waste stream, including zero waste programs. Site redevelopment would involve replacement

of

most of the buildings currently on the site within San Francisco and Brisbane with new recycling

and resource recovery facilities, maintenance facilities, administrative offices, and supporting

operations buildings. Plans for reuse of existing leased and owned offsite properties that are

currently integrated into Recology’s business operations, after the consolidation of operations,

have not been determined at this time.

Need for Facility Improvements

Existing Recology facilities are on an approximately 44.2-acre site, about 20.2 acres of which are situated within San Francisco and approximately 24 acres of which are within Brisbane. Existing

uses include 41,578 square feet of administrative buildings, 78,168 square feet of operations area, and 113,142 square feet of vehicle and container maintenance facilities. Existing site operations

and facilities are described in detail in Section 3.2.3 of this EIR.

Many of the site’s existing buildings are more than 50 years old. In addition, buildings on the

southern portion of the site were constructed on a landfill and have experienced significant

settlement. Utilities at the site have failed repeatedly in recent years due to differential settlement and corrosion. Also, according to Recology, the site is not efficiently configured for either current or future operations as a consequence of it being expanded incrementally over the years rather

than having been comprehensively designed. Due to growing operational needs, space constraints

have resulted in Recology moving some operations previously conducted at the site to offsite

locations within San Francisco, resulting in trucking inefficiencies, additional traffic, and greater emissions (Recology, 2011).

Recology has also determined that operational changes are needed to address changes that have

occurred since operations began at the site, as well as changes in the way that waste materials

now need to be managed. In 1989, the State of California mandated that all local jurisdictions

divert

50 percent of discarded materials from landfills. Subsequently, the City and County of San

Francisco (San Francisco) adopted policies that call for 75-percent diversion of material from

landfills by 2010 and zero waste by 2020. In support of these policies, San Francisco passed an

ordinance that took effect in October 2009 mandating separation of recyclable materials, organic

materials, and other materials by all residents and businesses. The proposed expansion and

redevelopment of the Recology site addresses the need for new facilities to process these

segregated streams for resource recovery and diversion to markets and to advance San Francisco’s

objective of zero waste. Thus, the need for Recology’s site expansion exists independent of any

action that may be taken with regard to any of the components of Project Site development.

Components of Proposed Expansion

Primary operational changes that would occur under the proposed expansion include

consolidation of offsite recycling; installation of new processing systems and technologies for

municipal solid waste, recycling, and organic waste streams; and consolidation of maintenance

facilities. Proposed new facilities are planned to anticipate technological advancement and to

accommodate changes over time. Because technologies are rapidly changing, systems and

technologies would be finalized closer to the time of building completion. For environmental and

efficiency purposes, offsite recycling and corporation yard facilities would be consolidated into

the expanded 65.5-acre Recology facility within the Project Site under the CPP-V Concept Plan

scenario. Ingress and egress to the site would be redesigned for greater functionality and for

integration with adjacent regional transportation improvements.

No significant change is anticipated in the total waste quantities of Recology’s San Francisco

facilities as those facilities are consolidated onto the Baylands site. Slight increases may occur based on growth in population and employment but may be offset by improved implementation

of initiatives such as packaging reduction. At present, this material must be trucked along with

other waste between Recology’s facilities. By consolidating all operations into one location,

Recology would be able to process material more effectively and increase the diversion rate from

landfills while reducing the overall number of truck trips.

The major components of the proposed expansion include:

•

Recycling Facilities

-

Paper and container recycling (blue cart)

-

Construction-and-demolition waste recycling

-

Public disposal and recycling

-

Reuse area

-

Buy-back recycling

•

Organics Processing Facility (green cart)

•

Mixed Waste Recycling and Processing (black cart)

•

Transfer Station

•

Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility

•

Vehicle Maintenance Facility

•

Container Maintenance Facility

•

Entrance Facility Upgrades (scales, scale-house, roads)

•

Environmental Learning Center and Visitor Facilities

•

Artist-in-Residence Gallery

•

Administrative Offices and Meeting Facilities

•

Vehicle Parking

•

Renewable Energy Generation (solar, wind, anaerobic digestion)

•

Landscaping, Stormwater Best Management Practices, and Demonstration Urban

Agriculture

Site Modifications

In order to accommodate Recology’s proposed new facilities and operations as described herein,

the CPP-V proposes to designate an additional 21.3 acres outside Recology’s existing boundaries

for Resource Recovery uses. The southerly expansion, as proposed, would result in the alignment

of future Geneva Avenue being moved south as compared to the alignment proposed under the

DSP. The proposed Recology expansion would also result in the closure of Beatty Road and the

realignment of Tunnel Avenue west to abut the Caltrain tracks.

Operations

Primary operations at the expanded Recology site would be essentially the same as the

combination of existing Baylands and offsite operations, which include waste management

through curbside collection, debris box rentals, hazardous waste collection, special collection of bulky/large items, waste reduction consultation, and other programs to help educate facility

managers and the public on how to appropriately handle various materials. As described above,

expanded and updated facilities would replace deteriorating structures and utilities and would

allow for implementation of

updated technologies to assist San Francisco increase its current 80-percent diversion rate to

achieve its goal of 100 percent diversion (zero waste) by 2020. Updated and expanded operations

facilities would include a paper and container recycling facility, an organics processing facility, and a mixed waste processing facility. These facilities would be configured in a single flexible

building that would be approximately 700,000 square feet.

A second new operations building that would be accessible to the public for recycling activities

would house the buy-back recycling program, a public disposal and recycling program, and the

majority of the household hazardous waste program. A small new building would be constructed

away from the public area to receive and manage certain household hazardous waste materials.

The existing buildings that house the construction-and-demolition waste recycling functions and

the existing transfer station would remain, with minor reconfigurations to integrate receiving and loading with the other functions.

Maintenance

On the south end of the Recology expansion site, an approximately 180,000-square-foot mixed-

use building would contain parking decks for cars and some service vehicles. The lower levels

would have access at grade and would provide service and maintenance facilities for vehicles and

equipment.

Administration

The administrative offices and meeting facilities would be approximately 100,000 square feet and

would include offices, customer service, meeting rooms, and related public education display

areas. The office building would include an entry at an elevated position meeting Geneva Avenue

as it rises to the west to cross over the Caltrain right-of-way. A meeting auditorium with kitchen facilities is included in this overall square footage.

Education and Outreach

The education and outreach programs would be located in a centrally located 31,000-square-foot

building at the top of the existing hill in the northern part of the site. This building would house the Artist in Residence Program and Environmental Learning Center and would act as the

reception area for visitors to the facilities.

Construction

Construction would be phased over a total of approximately four years, with the first phase

occurring over approximately 12 to 14 months. The expansion would require the use of some

heavy equipment for demolition and earth-moving operations. Equipment would include several

excavators for demolitions and earth-moving operations, as well as bulldozers to move earth

around the site where cut and fill is required. All fill would be obtained from current onsite

sources, such that no additional truck trips would be required. All demolition and construction

staging and associated parking would occur within the boundaries of the expanded Recology site.

3.6 General Plan Amendments

3.6.1 DSP and DSP-V General Plan Amendments

Implementation of the DSP and DSP-V Concept Plan scenarios would require adoption of

amendments to the City of Brisbane 1994 General Plan to allow for the proposed residential

development and to ensure consistency of development standards. Amendments to the 1994

General Plan for the DSP and DSP-V Concept Plan scenarios include the following:

•

Delete references to the former owner of the UPC property.

•

Modify the description of the Trade Commercial land use designation to add the phrase

“Within the Baylands, and subject to approval of a Specific Plan, the Trade Commercial

Designation may also include residential uses.”

•

Modify the discussion of maximum buildout for the Baylands to permit the intensity of

proposed site development.

•

Modify Policy 38.1 (roadway level of service standards) to recognize that current roadway

level of service standards (LOS D) will be exceeded due to future development in other

cities even if no development within the Project Site occurs, and provide roadway level of

service standards that accommodate the level of Project Site development approved for

development of the Brisbane Baylands Project Site.

•

Revise Policy 81.1 (establishment of educational opportunities consistent with the

sensitivity of onsite resources) to clearly require future development within the Project

Site to implement educational opportunities consistent with the sensitivity of onsite

resources.

•

Policy 87 and Policy 95 (parks standards): Should residential development be permitted

within the Project Site, either (1) require such development to provide actual park land

meeting General Plan standards for the provision of parks, or (2) modify the park standards

set forth in the General Plan to reflect the park land ratios required in the Brisbane

Municipal Code pursuant to the provisions of the Quimby Act.

•

Delete General Plan Policy 330.1, which prohibits housing within the Baylands.

•

In General Plan Policy 330, Program 330b, replace the phrase “not to exceed six stories in

height” with the phrase “not to exceed 45 feet in height;

•

Either (1) amend the General Plan Policy 337 (phasing schedule for Baylands

development) to include public services and facilities performance standards and

concurrency requirements, or (2) modify the proposed Specific Plan to include an

infrastructure phasing program that ties the rate of land development within the Project Site

to the availability of needed public services and facilities. (DSP and DSP-V scenarios only)

•

Either (1) modify Policy 340.1 (demonstration of feasibility of the Geneva Avenue

extension and provision of cost estimates with the first specific plan for the Baylands) to

call for demonstration of the engineering feasibility of the extension along with

establishment of the infrastructure phasing program or (2) require preparation of

preliminary cost estimates for the Geneva Avenue extension to be completed along with a

demonstration of the engineering and financial feasibility of the extension as part of the

proposed Specific Plan.

•

In General Plan Chapter VII (Open Space), replace the table entitled “1994 General Plan

Park Standards” to reflect the open space ratios proposed in the Brisbane Baylands Specific

Plan.

3.6.2 CPP and CPP-V General Plan Amendments

Implementation of the CPP and CPP-V Concept Plan scenarios would require amendments to the

City of Brisbane 1994 General Plan, including the following:

•

Delete references to the former owner of the UPC property.

•

Modify the discussion of maximum buildout for the Baylands to permit the intensity of

proposed site development

•

Modify the General Plan Land Use Map to expand the “Beatty Subarea” to reflect the

proposed expansion of the existing 44.2-acre Recology facility to 65.5 acres (CPP-V

Concept Plan scenario only), and amend the description of the Beatty Subarea to more

accurately reflect the intended use of the property for resource recovery purposes.

•

Modify Policy 38.1 (roadway level of service standards) to recognize that current roadway

level of service standards (LOS D) will be exceeded due to future development in other

cities even if no development within the Project Site occurs, and provide roadway level of

service standards that accommodate the level of Project Site development approved for

development of the Brisbane Baylands Project Site.

•

Amend General Plan Policy 337 (phasing schedule for Baylands development) to include

public services and facilities performance standards and concurrency requirements.

•

Modify Policy 374 (Beatty Subarea Land Use) to accommodate the land uses proposed in

the Concept Plan (CPP and CPP-V scenarios only).

3.7 Draft Brisbane Baylands Specific Plan

The General Plan also requires adoption of one or more specific plans prior to development of the

Baylands Subarea (see General Plan Policies 329.1 and 330). A specific plan was prepared by

UPC and submitted to the City for the proposed development of the DSP and DSP-V Concept Plan

scenarios. The Draft Brisbane Baylands Specific Plan (Specific Plan) includes a comprehensive plan for the 684-acre portion of the Baylands excluding the existing 44.2-acre Recology site,

including goals, policies, and development standards and plans to guide future development

actions. The Specific Plan also identifies necessary infrastructure and circulation improvements to accommodate proposed growth and a strategy intended to ensure coordinated implementation

(described below in Section 3.8.1). The Specific Plan includes the DSP and DSP-V Concept Plan

scenarios and is comprised of the following elements:

•

Sustainability Framework Plan: describes the overarching approach to sustainability and

the elements that have been incorporated into the plan to carry out the Specific Plan’s

objectives. This framework includes concepts for compact development, transit

accessibility, ecology and open space, alternative energy strategies, green building, and

other sustainable infrastructure elements.

•

Overall Land Use Concept: describes the overall land use and development concept for

the area, including specific land use goals, policies, and regulations. The overall

development program including the types and intensities of land use and the form and

pattern of new development and the community design principles and goals, development

standards, and design guidelines for development are also described.

•

Conservation & Open Space: describes the open space system and its primary

components, including the creation and conservation of ecological resources, such as

woodlands, meadows, and wetlands, and the incorporation of windrows, groves, and

landform elements. Open space also includes urban parks and recreational space. Open

space recommendations are linked to elements of other sections, including landscaped

areas, stormwater management, and overall energy conservation.

•

Circulation: describes the proposed circulation network and identifies the components and

design standards required for access and movement of pedestrians, bicyclists, transit, and

vehicles, including connections to adjacent systems, improvements to existing facilities,

and development of new facilities.

•

Utilities and Services: describes the infrastructure and service improvements proposed to

provide sewer, water, storm drainage, emergency response, and other utilities and services

to serve development using integrated stormwater management and other sustainable

technologies, wherever possible.

•

Implementation: describes steps that must be taken for implementation, including

development approval procedures and capital improvements.

•

Public Facilities Financing: identifies public improvement costs and potential sources of

funding and cost sharing.

The Specific Plan organizes development within the Project Site into the four “districts”

described below and shown in Figure 3-17.

3.7.1 Specific Plan Land Use Districts

Roundhouse District

The Roundhouse District is located within the northwestern corner of the Project Site and is

intended to be the primary residential district. Proposed residential development includes

primarily medium-density (45 to 70 dwelling units per net acre [du/nac]) to high-density (60 to

95 du/nac) residential buildings, including stacked flats and high-density townhouses at the

periphery. Single- use retail and office R&D uses are also permitted. Proposed retail uses consist of ground floor storefronts within high-density residential buildings. Office R&D uses in this district include a variety of office uses, generally situated along parks and open space areas.

Building heights for office R&D uses would be up to six stories (85 feet), with typical setbacks of 30 feet.

High-density stacked flats with ground floor retail are proposed along Geneva Avenue with

building heights ranging from a minimum of four stories (45 feet) to a maximum of 12 stories

(125 feet) near the transit station area. Units and towers are proposed to be set around

courtyards

over lower-level parking. Density would range from 60 to 95 du/nac.4 Medium-density stacked flats

with three to six stories (45 feet to 70 feet), including two eight-story (90-foot) towers, are proposed 4 Dwelling units per net acre do not include roadways and rights-of-way in the calculation.

along Geneva Avenue with densities ranging from 45 to 70 du/nac. Buildings are proposed to be

set around courtyards over lower-level parking. Ground floor retail is also proposed to establish a pedestrian-oriented shopping district. High-density townhomes are also proposed with townhomes

up to three stories (35-feet) in height and a density range of 25 to 35 du/nac.

Commercial single-use retail is proposed along Geneva Avenue with building heights of one to

two stories, not exceeding 45 feet.

East Geneva District

The East Geneva District encompassing the northeastern portion of the Project Site is intended to

be the primary commercial and office district. This district is proposed to contain over half of the Baylands proposed retail areas and all of its proposed high-rise office uses, in addition to a hotel and conference center. The majority of the district would be dedicated to office uses, including

high- and mid-rise and office R&D buildings. A central plaza is proposed, including recreational areas and a concert pavilion.

Retail and commercial uses are proposed in the area north of Geneva Avenue, including multiple

forms of retail development, from medium- to large-box national retailers to ground floor retail

along Geneva Avenue, and would be intended to serve both a local and regional market. Building

heights would range from two to three stories (up to 45 feet).

High-rise office development is proposed to form the core of the East Geneva District, with the

greatest amount of development intensity and activity proposed at ground level. Buildings are

envisioned to support offices on upper stories with retail on the ground floor to anchor a “Retail Main Street” area through the center of the district. One to two levels of subterranean parking are proposed. Building heights are proposed to range from six to nine stories (up to 125 feet), with

the tallest structures proposed at Geneva Avenue adjacent to the transit station area and along

Geneva Avenue east of the transit station area.

Mid-rise office development is proposed with offices on upper stories and ground floor retail on

Geneva Avenue and the proposed Retail Main Street, which would form a transition between the

most intense commercial development at the center of the district and the lower-rise office/R&D

uses at the southern end of the district. Building heights are proposed to be up to 70 feet with a single-level parking area at ground level beneath the building.

A hotel and conference center is proposed along Sierra Point Parkway (extended) with a

maximum building of 16 stories (160 feet).

Icehouse District

The Icehouse District is located within the central and western portions of the Project Site and is proposed as a multiuse district featuring residential, office/commercial, institutional, open space, and renewable energy generation uses. This district is also proposed to include an elementary

school and a charter high school. Residential areas are proposed to consist of townhomes

organized around a traditional street grid pattern and would be separated from the existing rail

corridor to the east by a six-acre linear array of ground-mounted photovoltaic (PV) renewable

energy production fields.

High-density and medium-density townhomes are proposed to be located between Roundhouse

Avenue and Icehouse Hill with buildings ranging from two to 3½ stories (up to 35 feet).

Building density is proposed to range from 25 to 35 du/nac for high-density units and 20 to 30

du/nac for medium-density units. Parking is intended to be located on the ground floor beneath

each unit. Office R&D uses are proposed similar to those in the Roundhouse and East Geneva

Districts but would be of a lower intensity and would include surface parking. Building heights

are proposed to be two to three stories.

Visitacion Green District

The Visitacion Green District is located in the central and southeastern portions of the Project

Site and is further divided in the Specific Plan into a North District and a South District.

North District

The Visitacion Green North District is proposed to be primarily developed with office/R&D uses in “campus-style” structures oriented along the edge of San Francisco Bay. Production and

warehouse uses are proposed to front the railroad corridor. Light industrial uses, including the

relocated lumberyards and a new water recycling facility, are proposed to be located within this

district.

Building heights in this district are proposed to be up to five stories (55 to 70 feet), or six stories (up to 85 feet) with approval of a variance, for office/R&D uses; one to three stories (25 to

45 feet) for secondary R&D uses; and one story with high ceilings (up to 25 feet) for light

industrial uses and the water recycling plant administration building.

South District

The Visitacion Green South District is proposed to have the lowest development intensity within

the Specific Plan area. More than half the land use within this district is proposed to be parks and open space. Low-rise campus R&D structures are proposed to the east near the Bay, and a small

cluster of restaurant/retail uses is proposed to overlook the lagoon and Bay. A 19-acre solar farm with arrays of PV panels is also proposed. Building heights are proposed to range from 25 feet to

45 feet (up to three stories).

3.8 Specific Plan for the CPP and CPP-V Scenarios

Unlike the DSP and DSP-V scenarios, for which a Specific Plan has been proposed, only Concept

Plans for the CPP and CPP-V scenarios are proposed at this time. Per the requirements of the

Brisbane General Plan, each Concept Plan scenario consists of a conceptual land use plan, as well

as a discussion of agencies with jurisdiction over site development and issues to be resolved with those agencies. As described below, the CPP and CPP-V scenarios also include an overall

circulation and infrastructure plan that would support development of the Baylands (see

Section 3.8.2). If either the CPP or CPP-V Concept Plan scenario were selected by the City,

preparation and approval of one or more specific plans consistent with the selected Concept

Plan would be required prior to site development.

3.9 Project Infrastructure

3.9.1 DSP and DSP-V Infrastructure

The infrastructure improvements described below, with the exception of water supply, are

included as part of Project Site development and are described in greater detail in Appendix B, Draft Brisbane Baylands Infrastructure Plan, prepared for UPC by BKF Engineers, Brown and

Caldwell, Geosyntec, GrafCon, Millenium Design, and Treadwell & Rollo (BFK, 2011). Impacts

related to development of proposed infrastructure improvements are analyzed in the applicable

individual resource sections within Chapter 4, Environmental Settings, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures, of this EIR.

The following site-wide infrastructure improvements are proposed as part of the DSP and DSP-V,

prior to or in concert with development of the Project Site:

•

Circulation improvements, including roadway and streetscape improvements, transit

connections, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and parking;

•

Park and trail improvements and habitat enhancement;

•

Installation of domestic water, recycled water (including recycled water facility), sanitary

sewage facilities, and storm drainage facilities;

•

Installation of a communications network; and

•

Installation of solar PV, wind turbines, and electrical and natural gas facilities.

Transportation and Circulation

The Circulation Element of the Specific Plan describes the transportation and circulation network

proposed for the DSP and DSP-V scenarios, including the components and design standards

proposed for access and movement of pedestrians, bicyclists, transit, and vehicles. It also

establishes specific standards and guidelines for Specific Plan area roadways.

Roadways

The Specific Plan proposes that the US Highway 101 continue to provide regional vehicular

access from the Candlestick Point interchange at Harney Way/Alana Way and the Sierra Point

interchange at Sierra Point Parkway/Lagoon Way. The Specific Plan also proposes that the

Project Site be served by three arterial streets: the existing Bayshore Boulevard, the planned

Geneva Avenue extension, and a planned Frontage Road.

Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan is intended to rely upon and be coordinated with

the phased implementation of several transportation projects identified in the Brisbane General

Plan and regional plans including the Bi-County Transportation Study and funded cooperatively

by a combination of public and private sources. The improvements within the Specific Plan area

identified in these citywide and regional plans include the Geneva Avenue extension, Candlestick

Point interchange improvements, and Sierra Point interchange improvements. The Specific Plan

proposes payment of fair-share financial contributions to the cost of completing these projects as a means of coordinating their construction with development of the DSP and DSP-V scenarios.

As described in the proposed Specific Plan, the DSP and DSP-V scenarios include construction of

a number of new collector and local streets within the Baylands to provide access to proposed

development areas and accommodate the increase in vehicle trips generated by proposed

development. The following roadway improvements are described in the Specific Plan and

included as part of the DSP and DSP-V scenarios:

•

Tunnel Avenue: Tunnel Avenue is proposed to be rebuilt as a Collector Street within a

realigned right-of-way, to terminate at a reconfigured Lagoon Way.

•

Lagoon Way: Lagoon Way is proposed to be rebuilt as a Collector Street within a

realigned right-of-way and is proposed to be extended from the Sierra Point interchange to

Bayshore Boulevard and the Tunnel Avenue overpass and roadway.

•

Sierra Point Parkway: Sierra Point Parkway is proposed to be extended as an Arterial

Street between Beatty Avenue and Lagoon Way, north of the present Sierra Point Parkway.

•

Roundhouse Arc Road: An overpass is proposed to be constructed over Tunnel Avenue

and the Caltrain tracks along Roundhouse Arc Road between Roundhouse Circle and Sierra

Point Parkway.

•

Creek Parkway: Creek Parkway (D Street East) is proposed to be constructed as a

Collector Street between Sierra Point Parkway and Tunnel Avenue.

The proposed roadway network for the DSP and DSP-V is described in greater detail in the

Specific Plan (see Appendix C of the Specific Plan) and in Chapter 4, Section 4.N, Traffic and Circulation, of this EIR. Table 3-5 below provides a summary of the functional classifications for the roadways proposed in the Specific Plan.

Connections to Transit Services

The Specific Plan states that, in the near term, transit services would be available from the

existing Caltrain Bayshore Station, which would connect to the Baylands via Tunnel Avenue and

Sunnydale Avenue or 5th Street, and to San Francisco Municipal Railway (Muni) and SamTrans

buses along Bayshore Boulevard. Under the DSP and DSP-V, the Specific Plan proposes that

Geneva Avenue be designed to accommodate long-term planned Muni bus rapid transit (BRT)

service, which would provide connection from the Bayview community to the BART Balboa

Park Station.

TABLE 3-5

PROPOSED CIRCULATION SYSTEM AND FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS

Functional

Street

Classification

Extent

Geneva Avenue

Arteriala

Extended from Bayshore Boulevard to the

US Highway 101 southbound ramps at Beatty

Avenue/ Alana Way

Bayshore Boulevard

Arterial

US Highway 101 in San Francisco to

US Highway 101 near the Brisbane and South

San Francisco border/ Alana

Sierra Point Parkway

Arterial

Beatty Avenue to Lagoon Way

Beatty Avenue

Collectorb

Tunnel Avenue to US Highway 101

Tunnel Avenue

Collector

Realigned from Beatty Avenue to Lagoon

Way; terminated at Lagoon Way

Lagoon Way

Collector

Realigned from US Highway 101 to Tunnel

Avenue/Bayshore Boulevard

Creek Parkway (D Street (East))

Collector

Sierra Point Parkway to Tunnel Avenue

Retail Main Street (P Street)

Collector

Tunnel Avenue to Roundhouse Arc Road

Roundhouse Arc Road (J Street)

Collector

Roundhouse Circle to Sierra Point Parkway

Roundhouse Circle

Collector

Around Roundhouse Green

Residential – Promenade (2nd Sreet. East and

Collector

Roundhouse Circle to Sunnydale Avenue

West)

Office (8th Street North)

Collector

Beatty Road to Sierra Point Parkway

R& D – Quad (7th Street East and West)

Collector

Roundhouse Arc Road to Creek Parkway

Residential Flats (L-S Streets, 3rd-5th Streets)

Localc

Between Bayshore Boulevard & Caltrain

tracks

Residential Townhomes

Local

South of Geneva Avenue and west of Caltrain

Office (L and M Streets, 6th-8th Streets)

Local

South of Geneva Avenue, north of

Roundhouse Arc Road, east of Tunnel

Avenue

R&D Area (E and G, 6th Street)

Local

South of Roundhouse Arc Road, north of

Creek Parkway

Alley

NA

Locations to be determined per individual

development plans

NA = not applicable

a Provides the highest level of service at the greatest speed for the longest uninterrupted distance, with some degree of access control.

b Provides a less highly developed level of service at a lower speed for shorter distances by collecting traffic from local roads and connecting them with arterials.

c Consists of all roads not defined as arterials or collectors; primarily provides access to land with little or no through movement.

SOURCE: Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC, 2011.

Buildout of the proposed Specific Plan for the DSP and DSP-V scenarios relies upon the planned

extension of the Muni T-Third Street light rail line to connect to the Caltrain Bayshore Station, as well as a planned BRT line along the Geneva Avenue extension to Candlestick Point.

Additionally, the Specific Plan relies on a proposed new intermodal transit station, incorporating Caltrain’s Bayshore Station, to be located near the intersection of Caltrain tracks and the extended Geneva

Avenue, to directly connect transit services by accommodating more frequent Caltrain services,

the proposed BRT on Geneva Avenue, the southern terminus of the Muni T-Third Street light rail,

and Muni and SamTrans buses. As with planned regional roadway and intersection improvements

that are integral to buildout of the site, the Specific Plan proposes fair-share financial

contributions to the cost of these improvements to facilitate their completion.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Paths

The Specific Plan proposes a network of pedestrian and bicycle paths within the Baylands.

Pedestrian circulation is proposed to include sidewalks and single- or multi-use paths adjacent to roadways within the Specific Plan area. The Specific Plan also establishes streetscape standards

and guidelines for the provision of these facilities. Enhanced pedestrian street crossings are

proposed in the Specific Plan to provide traffic calming effects and reduced distances at

pedestrians crossing streets by using curb extensions or similar features that allow pedestrians and approaching vehicle drivers to see each other when vehicles parked in a parking lane would

otherwise block visibility. The Specific Plan proposes one pedestrian overcrossing over the

Caltrain right-of-way and Tunnel Avenue for pedestrians and bicyclists.

Parking and Loading

In addition to the proposed building areas, the Specific Plan proposes construction of surface

parking lots, parking podiums (a parking configuration where parking is either at-grade or

partially below grade with the building’s use above), and stand-alone parking structures. As

described in the proposed Specific Plan, and discussed in Chapter 4, Section 4.N, Traffic and

Circulation, of this EIR, parking requirements and parking management strategies are proposed to be included in Transportation Demand Management plans to be prepared for development

proposed pursuant to the Specific Plan.

Open Space and Trails

As shown in Table 3-2A, the Specific Plan reserves approximately 170 acres (roughly 30 percent

of its developable area) for open space and public use areas under the DSP and DSP-V scenarios.

Additionally, the Specific Plan intends that 5 to 10 percent of the land within private development sites (approximately 16 acres) be dedicated to open areas consisting of planted and paved outdoor

spaces, such as plazas, courtyards, and gardens.

Open space areas are proposed by the Specific Plan to include both passive and active areas.

Passive recreational areas are proposed along the Visitacion Creek corridor, around Icehouse Hill, and along the edges of Brisbane Lagoon. The primary open space element proposed by the

Specific Plan is the Visitacion Creek Park, which would be centered on a new creek channel

reconfigured around the existing tidal channel. Upper portions of the creek would provide areas for passive recreational use, while the low-lying portion would be less developed, responding to tidal, flooding, and seasonal fluctuations in hydrology.

The Specific Plan states that the lagoon may offer water-related recreational activities such

canoeing and kayaking. The more active use areas proposed by the Specific Plan include parks

and cultural features spread across the Specific Plan area and the extension of the San Francisco

Bay Trail along the US Highway 101 frontage road. Commercial recreational opportunities, such

as bicycle and kayak rental, are proposed to be allowed within the open space network.

The open space areas proposed in the Specific Plan include land reserved for wildlife habitat,

public parks, landscaped areas, open areas within development sites, and other passive and active

recreational uses. The Specific Plan area is proposed to be traversed by a network of

pedestrian/multiuse trails. In the eastern portion of the Specific Plan area, the north-south spine of the trail network is proposed to include construction of a new section of the San Francisco Bay

Trail. In the western portion of the Specific Plan area, a new north-south greenway is proposed to connect the northern boundary of the area to the Roundhouse building, over or around Icehouse

Hill and farther south into downtown Brisbane.

Utilities

Utilities proposed for the DSP and DSP-V scenarios are described both within the Specific Plan

and within the Draft Brisbane Baylands Infrastructure Plan. As noted above, the Specific Plan is included as Appendix C of this EIR. The Infrastructure Plan is included as Appendix B of the

Specific Plan.

Stormwater Drainage

As described in the Specific Plan, the storm drain concept includes a stormwater management

system using a reconfigured Visitacion Creek, expanded wetlands, and bioswales. The system is

proposed to be designed in compliance with the City of Brisbane Storm Drainage Master Plan

(RBF, 2003), and stormwater treatment would be designed to meet the requirements of the

NPDES permit. A detailed analysis of the stormwater system proposed in the Specific Plan is

included in Chapter 4, Section 4.H, Hydrology and Water Quality, of this EIR.

Wastewater System

The Project Site lies within the BSD, which owns and operates wastewater collection facilities

within the Brisbane city limits. To accommodate existing uses and buildout of the DSP and

DSP-V scenarios, the Specific Plan proposes that the existing onsite wastewater collection system

and associated facilities be completely replaced in phases as development on the site occurs. New

facilities constructed as part of the proposed wastewater collection system would be designed to

meet applicable standards of the City, the BSD, and Brisbane Baylands Infrastructure Plan design

criteria.

An onsite recycled water plant is proposed to be constructed to supply recycled water to Baylands

development and discharge sewage in excess of the Baylands recycled water demand to a 78-inch

SFPUC sewer line along Sunnydale Avenue. The onsite recycled water plant would be capable of

providing an average daily recycled water demand of 0.58 MGD with capacity to handle a

maximum daily demand of 0.68 MGD, providing a tertiary level of treatment in order to supply

recycled water for non-potable uses within the Project Site. Prior to the construction of the onsite recycled water plant (up to 15 years of the Project Site’s 20-year buildout), sewage generated

within the Project Site would flow through a conventional sewer system and discharge directly to

the SFPUC sewer system.

There are two proposed designs for the recycled water plant: (1) a mechanical scalping plant or

(2) a natural scalping plant which utilizes constructed wetlands as part of the treatment process.

The conventional mechanical scalping plant would implement technology such as membrane

bioreactors and vortex grit systems as part of the tertiary treatment process. The natural scalping plant would use natural scalping methods and free surface treatment wetlands.

For both alternative designs, effluent in excess of recycled water demands would be sent to San

Francisco via a force main to the SFPUC sewer system for treatment by SFPUC. Excess effluent

from the recycled water plant could also be used to develop wetlands in the Baylands, either with

or without effluent discharge to the improved Visitacion Creek. A non-discharging wetlands

condition would be created either by limiting the amount of discharged effluent or by pumping

excess (non- consumed) effluent from the downstream end of the wetlands back to the SFPUC

system for treatment and disposal. Effluent quality from the on-site recycled water plant generally would be suitable for discharge, but direct discharge to the Bay may be postponed due to potential time delays associated with obtaining a discharge permit from the RWQCB. If direct discharging

were to occur, the most likely outfall would be to Visitacion Creek rather than directly to the Bay.

The selection of the preferred recycled water plant option will be based on siting, environmental

and economic constraints, and completed during the design and permitting process.

A detailed analysis of the wastewater system impacts, including the recycled water plant, is

included in Chapter 4, Section 4.O, Utilities. Service Systems and Water Supply, of this EIR.

Onsite Water System

The proposed Specific Plan outlines a conceptual water system for the DSP and DSP-V scenarios

consisting of 8-inch, 14-inch, and 20-inch diameter water pipelines across the Specific Plan area.

A new 20-inch pipeline is proposed to be installed beneath Bayshore Boulevard from Main Street

to Lagoon Way, with 8-inch and 14-inch lines installed within the Specific Plan area. The Specific Plan proposes that 14-inch lines be installed beneath Sierra Point Parkway, Lagoon Way, Tunnel

Avenue, and undetermined arterial streets within proposed development areas. A permanent

connection to an existing 12-inch SFPUC water line is also proposed to be established beneath

Tunnel Avenue, just south of Beatty Road. A detailed analysis of impacts related to the proposed

water delivery system, including water supply, is included in Chapter 4, Section 4.O, Utilities, Service Systems and Water Supply, of this EIR.

Communications

Both AT&T and Comcast Cable currently serve Brisbane. The Specific Plan proposes that

telecommunications infrastructure, including telephone, cable, and high-speed fiber optics, be

installed in an underground combined joint trench with electric and natural gas facilities. An

analysis of impacts related to communications facilities is included Chapter 4, Section 4.P,

Energy Resources, of this EIR.

Energy

The Specific Plan proposes that electric power and natural gas for construction and future uses

continue to be provided by Pacific Gas and Electric Company. To meet a portion of energy

demand though onsite generation, the Specific Plan proposed that 25 acres be dedicated to

renewable energy generation, as well as building-integrated and rooftop renewable energy-

generating features such as PV panels. Projected energy use and generation are evaluated in detail in Chapter 4, Section 4.P, Energy Resources, of this EIR.

3.9.2 CPP and CPP-V Infrastructure

Because the Concept Plans for the CPP and CPP-V scenarios include land use configurations and

intensities that are different from those proposed by the Specific Plan for the DSP and DSP-V

scenarios, the placement of certain infrastructure, such as local roadways, utility connections, and communications and energy infrastructure, and specific sizes of facilities would be different from those proposed for the DSP and DSP-V scenarios. Specific proposals for development and

financing of public facilities and infrastructure would need to be described in detail within a

specific plan, and an associated infrastructure plan would be required for implementation of the

CPP and CPP-V Concept Plan scenarios.

However, for the purpose of assessing programmatic environmental impacts related to

infrastructure development, basic infrastructure improvements would include the following:

•

Circulation improvements, including roadway and streetscape improvements, transit

connections, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and parking, would be provided. Analysis is

provided in this EIR regarding traffic generation and the facilities needed to maintain City

roadway level of service standards. The CPP and CPP-V Concept Plan scenarios would

rely upon the same regional improvements upon which the DSP and DSP-V Concept Plan

scenarios depend. The CPP and CPP-V scenarios would each include a system of transit

connections and pedestrian and bicycle paths providing connectivity throughout the Project

Site, along with connections to the existing Brisbane community, as shown in Figures 3-13

and 3-14. Parking for uses proposed by the CPP and CPP-V scenarios would be provided

in accordance with existing City zoning requirements, unless modified through a

subsequent specific plan.

•

Park and trail improvements would meet or exceed applicable policies of the Brisbane

General Plan as conceptually shown in the CPP and CPP-V and would specifically exceed

General Plan requirements that 25 percent of the Project Site be retained as open

space/open area. Development of a specific plan for the CPP and CPP-V scenarios would

also include habitat protection and enhancement consistent with the provisions of the

Brisbane General Plan.

•

Domestic water, recycled water (including an onsite recycled water facility as described for

the DSP and DSP-V scenarios), sanitary sewage facilities, and storm drainage facilities

would be installed. A domestic water system capable of providing water service to uses

within the Project Site analyzed in this EIR would be engineered and provided in

accordance with applicable City design standards. A wastewater collection system capable

of accepting sewage from uses within the Project Site would be engineered and provided in

accordance with applicable City and BSD design standards and would include a proposed

recycled water plant similar to what is shown for the DSP.

•

Installation of a communications network would occur consistent with the requirements of

the utility agencies provided communications services.

•

Installation of electrical and natural gas facilities would occur pursuant to the requirements

of Pacific Gas and Electric Company.

Planned infrastructure under the CPP and CPP-V would differ from that proposed under the DSP

and DSP-V in the alignment of the Geneva Avenue extension, the amount of open space

provided, and the placement of renewable energy-generating facilities. Under the CPP and CPP-V

scenarios, the alignment of the Geneva Avenue extension would be somewhat farther south than

that proposed under the DSP and DSP-V (see Figures 3-11 and 3-12). The CPP and CPP-V

scenarios would reserve approximately 330 acres (approximately 45 percent of the Project Site)

for open space and public use areas. Like the DSP and DSP-V scenarios, the CPP and CPP-V

scenarios include commercial recreation opportunities within the larger open space network, such

as bicycle rentals near multiuse trails, kayak rentals near the lagoon area, and the group use area north of Icehouse Hill. The CPP-V Concept Plan scenario also includes onsite infrastructure to

serve expansion of Recology facilities.

Specific locations for renewable energy facilities were generally not shown on the CPP or CPP-V

Concept Plans. Renewable energy generation under the CPP and CPP-V scenarios is anticipated

to consist of a combination of small-scale wind and solar facilities installed on rooftops and

spaces dedicated to other uses, as well as within stand-alone solar “farms” and wind turbine

generation on land dedicated to that use. Recology has stated its intent to provide for renewable

energy generation on rooftops, and over parking within their proposed expanded facility, and also

to produce biogas in from green waste. While the placement of such facilities may differ between

Concept Plan scenarios, it was the intent of the CPP and CPP-V scenarios to generate a similar

amount of renewable energy to the DSP and DSP-V scenarios. For purposes of this EIR analysis,

it is therefore assumed that the total amount of renewable energy generated under all four

scenarios would be the same. Development of renewable energy generation facilities is also

included as part of the proposed Recology site expansion.

3.10 Water Supply

Potable water supply for the development of the Project Site under each Concept Plan scenario

would come from a proposed water transfer agreement (Agreement) between the City of Brisbane

and OID. The proposed Agreement between the City and OID would guarantee the transfer of up

to

2,400 AFY, that is not subject to the permitting jurisdiction of the State Water Resources Control Board, for a term of 50 years. A total of 2,000 acre-feet of this amount would be reserved for use within the Project Site, while the remaining 400 acre-feet of supply would be used for buildout of the City’s existing General Plan. The proposed Agreement relies upon existing facilities and does

not require the construction of any new facilities. The diagram below shows the general pathway

of the water transfer from OID to Brisbane. While the Agreement has been proposed to provide

an ensured water supply for the Baylands, the Agreement is being considered as an independent

component of the Project Site development and could be approved or not regardless of any action

taken by the City to approve, modify, or not approve any of the proposed Concept Plans or the

Specific Plan proposed by UPC.

The method of water delivery to Brisbane set forth in the Agreement is illustrated and discussed

in more detail below.

OID is located in the northeast portion of the San Joaquin Valley within Stanislaus and

San Joaquin Counties. The majority of OID’s water supplies come from pre-1914 surface water

rights that enable OID to divert up to 257,074 AFY from the Stanislaus River at Goodwin Dam

upstream of the city of Oakdale without restrictions. The proposed transfer would be

implemented by OID physically delivering up to 2,400 AFY of water into the MID system, via

existing facilities (i.e., released from OID’s Claribel canal system, generally located near Claribel Road south of the city of Riverbank into MID’s South Main Canal). MID would make use of the

2,400 AFY and in turn hold an excess equivalent amount of Tuolumne River water in storage in

New Don Pedro Reservoir, in Tuolumne County, northeast of LaGrange. The SFPUC has a water

bank account in New Don Pedro Reservoir, from which MID would credit the SFPUC with the

annual amount provided by OID to the City, up to the maximum of 2,400 AFY. The SFPUC

would, in turn, deliver up to 2,400 AFY from its regional water supply system (Hetch Hetchy

system, which generally runs from the Sierra Nevada Mountains in Yosemite National Park

through the Central Valley and South San Francisco Bay to San Francisco) to the City using its

existing water supply infrastructure and operational plans.

Brisbane has negotiated a term sheet with OID for the proposed water transfer. Brisbane is

responsible for establishing a transfer agreement with MID and a wheeling agreement with

the SFPUC to provide for the conveyance of the OID water transfer to Brisbane.

3.11 Remedial Actions

As described previously, portions of the Project Site have been contaminated by prior uses and

must undergo environmental cleanup (remediation) prior to new development occurring within

the Baylands. These areas include the former Brisbane Landfill site and the former Southern

Pacific Bayshore Railyard, which for regulatory purposes is divided into two separate Operable

Units: OU-1 and OU-2. While the need for ongoing remediation of the former landfill and

railyard areas does not result from Project Site development under any of the proposed Concept

Plan scenarios, implementation of future development projects on the Brisbane Baylands is

dependent on cleanup of these properties, and land use decisions resulting from Project approvals

would heavily influence the specific remedial actions required by the appropriate regulatory

agencies.

Following is a description of the likely landfill closure activities and potential remedial actions that would occur prior to implementation of any of the Concept Plan development scenarios

analyzed in this EIR. Contamination and remediation issues are discussed in further detail in

Chapter 4, Section 4.G, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of this EIR.

3.11.1 Demolition and Deconstruction

Under each of the proposed Concept Plan scenarios, preparation of lands subject to remediation

includes the demolition and deconstruction of all buildings other than those to be adapted for

long-term reuse, site structures (retaining walls, utility structures), streets and pavements, existing utilities, and landscape elements that are incompatible with the proposed land development

program and design. The buildings to be demolished or deconstructed are primarily constructed

of wood, masonry, and concrete and were formerly used for administration, railyard maintenance,

and industrial operations. To the extent practical, existing structures would be “deconstructed,”

allowing for maximum reuse of materials, where feasible.

Demolition/deconstruction would occur in phases in conjunction with projected building

construction phases and with required environmental remediation and landfill closure. Phasing of

such activities would allow the existing utility services, vehicular access areas, and vegetation to remain in place as long as possible in order to reduce disruption to existing uses within the

Baylands.

3.11.2 Closure Activities at the Former Brisbane Landfill

Conditions at the former landfill that would be addressed by proposed remedial activities include

landfill gas migration, leachate5 generation and transport into groundwater and surface water, and settlement of the landfill surface with ongoing consolidation of refuse and underlying geologic

materials (Bay Muds).

Regardless of the future land uses ultimately approved within the former landfill site, a set of

minimum, presumptive actions, as defined by the regulatory requirements described in

Section 20260 of Title 27 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), must be taken to achieve

landfill closure and to minimize or eliminate risk to human health and the environment.

To bring the former Brisbane Landfill into compliance with the appropriate portions of Title 27

and to establish a discharge monitoring program for the landfill, the following closure activities are proposed and would be applicable to all four Concept Plan scenarios:

•

Adoption of Closure Waste Discharge Requirements by the RWQCB prior to landfill

development;

•

Approval of the landfill Final Closure and Postclosure Plans by the regulatory agencies,

including the RWQCB, CalRecycle/San Mateo County Department of Health Services, and

City of Brisbane;

•

Continued monitoring of landfill settlement;

•

Operation and maintenance of the existing Leachate Seep Collection and Transmission

System, as needed;

•

Operation and maintenance of the landfill Gas Collection and Control System, as needed;

•

Continued groundwater, surface water, and leachate quality monitoring and evaluation;

•

Installation of the final cover system over the entire landfill (or another design as approved

by RWQCB and San Mateo County)and implementation of measures to control and

monitor migration of landfill gas;

•

Installation and monitoring of the landfill gas perimeter monitoring stations;

•

Final cover post-closure maintenance, including cover inspection; and

•

Land use controls, including deed restrictions that limit site uses, the extent of which will

be based on concentrations of contaminants that remain in place, and requirements for soil

management plans, non-interference with the soil cap, and annual inspection and reporting

of maintenance of land use controls.

In accordance with the Waste Discharge Requirements, location-specific plans would be required

to be prepared defining the particular remedial action components or landfill closure elements

5 Leachate is liquid draining from a landfill that may contain contaminants. Contaminants of concern for the shallow and deep groundwaters at the former Brisbane Landfill include inorganics (ammonia, nitrate, sulfate, total dissolved solids, and total organic carbon); metals; VOCs; semi-volatile organic compounds; and organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls.

that must be put into place to accommodate the proposed development, regardless of the

particular development scenario. The location-specific plans would need to address such issues,

maintaining the required three-percent minimum grade or other site requirements set forth by the

RWQCB (CCR Title 27 regulations) and long-term maintenance of all remedial action

components. Landfill closure activities are analyzed in greater detail in Chapter 4, Section 4.G,

Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of this EIR.

3.11.3 Remedial Actions at OU-1 and OU-2

Potential remedial technologies for OU-1 and OU-2 based on site-specific contaminated media

and contaminants are shown in Table 3-6 below. The identified remedies represent a range of potential technologies for remediating these areas to meet cleanup levels acceptable for proposed

future development. The final remedy selection process will be conducted under the jurisdiction

of DTSC for OU-1 and RWQCB for OU-2 as part of preparation of Remedial Action Plans that

will undergo public review prior to approval.

TABLE 3-6

POTENTIAL REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR OPERABLE UNIT 1 (OU-1) AND

OPERABLE UNIT 2 (OU-2)

Remedial Technologies

Targeted

Targeted

Targeted

Excavation

Excavation

Excavation

Targeted

Monitored

with Offsite

with Onsite

with Onsite

Soil-Vapor

Vapor

In Situ Bio-

Natural

Contaminants

Disposal

Treatment

Relocation

Extraction

Capping

Systems

remediation

Attenuation

VOCs in soil

X

X

X

X

X

X

Metals in soil

X

X

X

Residual

Bunker C in soil

X

X

X

X

X

Free Product

Bunker C in soil

X

X

VOCs in

X

X

X

groundwater

TPH in

X

X

X

groundwater

VOCs = volatile organic compounds

TPH = total petroleum hydrocarbons

SOURCE: Geosyntec Consultants, 2012.

Remedial actions for both OU-1 and OU-2 have been proposed in prior proposed Remedial

Action Plans, and some remedial actions have already been implemented. Remedial Action Plans

for OU-2 were initially proposed in the Final Revised Remedial Action Plan (B&M, 2002) and

revised in the 2004 Interim Remedial Measures work plan (B&M, 2004). However, because

specific land uses are now being proposed for development in this area, alternative remedial

activities are being considered and will be finalized during the revised Remedial Action Plan for

OU-2.

Numerous studies have been conducted and remedial actions have been implemented for the San

Francisco portion of OU-1. Groundwater contamination in OU-1 affecting both San Francisco

and San Mateo counties is being remediated as a part of the Schlage Lock remedial efforts.

However, soil in the San Mateo County portion of OU-1 has not yet been remediated. Prior to any

ground-disturbing activities for development within the two Operable Units, an updated Remedial

Action Plan will be required to be prepared and approved by DTSC for OU-1 and the RWQCB

for OU-2 to outline an approach for remediation that is specific to the land uses ultimately

approved by the City.

DTSC and the RWQCB are the designated lead agencies for determination and oversight of soil

and groundwater cleanup requirements and permissible types of new development on OU-1 and

OU-2, respectively. All remedial activities, whether for soil or groundwater, will continue to be

conducted in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, and in conformance with remedial

designs and associated work plans approved by DTSC or the RWQCB. Acceptable cleanup levels

will be determined by these regulatory agencies based on the land uses ultimately included in the

selected Concept Plan and specific plan approved by the City and associated remediation

feasibility.

These issues are discussed in further detail in Chapter 4, Section 4.G, Hazards and Hazardous

Materials, of this EIR.

3.12 Site Preparation and Grading

The following site preparation and grading activities are described in the Draft Infrastructure Plan prepared for the Specific Plan. Because requirements for the preparation of the Baylands for

future development would be very similar regardless of which Concept Plan is ultimately

selected, the following descriptions apply to all four proposed Concept Plan scenarios. As

discussed in the applicable technical discussions included in Chapter 4, Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures, the Infrastructure Plan in which these proposed actions are described has been reviewed independently by the City.

3.12.1 Landfill Area

Proposed grading for the former landfill area is based on the large amount of existing fill in the area and the anticipated settlement of the landfill waste and underlying Bay Mud. The estimated

amount of settlement that would need to be accommodated is approximately 18 to 30 inches over

a 20-year time period. Larger amounts of settlement may require intensive maintenance and more

frequent repairs, as well as re-grading of site improvements. Based on the anticipated settlement

ranges for finished grades between elevations 21 to 26 feet above sea level, a conceptual grading

plan was completed for the former landfill area.6 In order to achieve the conceptual proposed

finished grades, grading operations would include approximately 4,475,000 cubic yards of cut,

inclusive of the 700,000 cubic yards of soil that have been added to site since 2007, and

6 All elevations are based on National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 “NGVD 29” (BKF, 2011).

approximately 3,397,000 cubic yards of fill7 (BKF, 2011). This would require approximately

3,730,000 cubic yards of export from the former landfill area, primarily to the westerly, former

railyard portion of the site. As described below, approximately 2,600,000 cubic yards of soil will be exported to the Railyard area, with the remaining approximately 1,130,000 cubic yards being

off-hauled from the site.

3.12.2 Former Railyard Area

Grading for the former railyard area is dictated by required capping of soil/groundwater

contamination, the historic structures that are scheduled to remain, extension of the existing

drainage channel, and connections to the proposed Geneva Avenue extension over the Caltrain

right-of-way. As in the landfill area, the amount of added soil would increase the potential for

settlement caused by consolidation of underlying Bay Mud soils. The target amount of settlement

to be accommodated by the grading design is approximately 18 to 30 inches over a 20-year

period. To achieve the conceptual proposed finished grades for the former railyard area, grading

operations would include approximately 54,000 cubic yards of cut and approximately

2,600,000 cubic yards of fill. Transport of fill from the former landfill area to the former railyard area could include the following options:

•

Transport via truck on Tunnel Avenue and Bayshore Boulevard (which would require

approximately 173,400 truck trips);

•

Use of a conveyor belt system over the Caltrain right-of-way (requiring review and

approval by Caltrain); or

•

A combination of both of the above options.

3.12.3 Geotechnical Site Improvements

Building and infrastructure design would include foundation piles, hinged slabs, and other

features to accommodate differential settlement, liquefaction, and other geotechnical issues

associated with construction on a former landfill. More specific improvements would be proposed

as specific uses and associated development projects are proposed onsite. Geological resource

impacts are discussed in detail in Chapter 4, Section 4.E, Geology, Soils, and Seismicity, of this EIR.

3.13 Project Objectives

The following subsections identify Project objectives that have been identified by the Lead

Agency (the City of Brisbane), as well as those identified by the Specific Plan applicant, UPC, as part of the Specific Plan, and by Recology for the proposed expansion and redevelopment of its

existing facility. For the purposes of analyzing the effects of the Project Site development as

compared to the alternatives to the Project Site development presented in Chapter 5, Alternatives, the City’s Project objectives are employed.

7 The difference between the amount of cut and amount of fill and import soil is accounted for by compaction of soils.

3.13.1 Objectives Identified by the City of Brisbane

Overarching Objectives

The City’s overarching objective is to establish a development plan for the Baylands that will be a leading model of sustainable development, which is a source of pride to Brisbane and

demonstrates that environmental, social, and economic considerations can be harmonized to the

betterment of the natural environment, the Brisbane and regional community, and the individuals

who will use the Baylands. Sustainable development is simply defined as “development that meets

the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own

needs.”

The Project Site development objectives identified below have been organized around three

major components of sustainability: environmental protection and enhancement, social equity,

and economics.

Environmental Protection and Enhancement Objectives

A.

Remediate the Baylands to a level which ensures the safety of all who use the site, and

eliminates ongoing ecological damage.

B.

Incorporate a “green building” approach for all future development on the Baylands,

wherein buildings are sited, designed, constructed and operated to encourage resource

conservation, minimize waste and pollution, maximize energy and resource efficiency, and

promote healthy indoor environments.

C.

Preserve, restore and enhance wetlands and natural habitat on the site and create natural

linkages across the site to promote physical and visual connectivity between the San Bruno

Mountains and the Bay.

D.

Promote and encourage non-vehicular access and movement to and from the site

(particularly from Central Brisbane) and within the site as well. Land use mix, good urban

design, the provision of safe and pleasant pedestrian and bike paths, and convenient access

and linkages to public transit are all necessary components.

E.

Strive to achieve energy neutrality or better for the project through a combination of

efficiency, conservation, and maximizing on site renewable power generation.

F.

Minimize the net consumption of water supplies.

G.

Safely and efficiently accommodate project traffic in a manner that does not adversely

impact Brisbane or adjacent communities.

H.

Incorporate innovative methods to reduce resource consumption and waste generation.

I.

Site and design new infrastructure to minimize adverse environmental impacts.

J.

Design the project sensitively to protect Brisbane’s viewshed, taking into account light

spillage and pollution, building height and massing, and placement of landscape features.

K.

Maximize solid waste diversion with the goal of achieving zero waste.

Social Equity Objectives

L.

Incorporate significant open space and related improvements which provide opportunities

for a wide range of passive and active public recreational opportunities benefiting the City

and region.

M.

Provide employment opportunities for Brisbane residents and residents of nearby local

communities, thereby improving the jobs/housing balance at regional and subregional

levels.

N.

Contribute to critically-needed solutions to regional transit and transportation issues which

will benefit both the project and existing communities.

O.

Recognize that the project is of regional significance, and provide for the well-being not

only of the City of Brisbane, but also of surrounding communities.

P.

Provide on-site opportunities for public art and education to contribute to public

understanding of the site, including its history, ecology and the project’s

sustainability mission.

Economic Objectives

Q.

Enhance the City’s tax base and future ability to improve services within all of Brisbane.

R.

Retain and accommodate the expansion of existing businesses within the Baylands that

contribute to the City's fiscal health and economic vitality.

S.

Establish a project which remains economically viable on a long-term basis, including

excellence in architecture which can withstand the test of time.

T.

Build in flexibility so the project can adapt to changing market conditions over time,

without compromising the other stated project objectives.

U.

Provide greater choices for Brisbane residents by providing desired goods, services,

entertainment, and/or other amenities not currently available within the City.

3.13.2 Objectives Identified by the Specific Plan

Applicant, UPC

In preparing the Specific Plan, UPC (the applicant for the Specific Plan) identified the following general project objectives that apply to the DSP and DSP-V Concept Plan scenarios.

Remediation and Redevelopment

1.

The reclamation of former railyards and landfill areas for safe and productive future use

through the remediation of pollutants from the site’s industrial past.

2.

A land use mix and development program, for which the financial return could offset the

significant costs associated with landfill closure, site remediation, infrastructure

construction and other site improvements necessary for the safe and productive use of the

Baylands.

3.

A mix of land uses that provides fiscal benefit to the City through the generation of

increased tax revenue, and is flexible to accommodate market trends.

Economic Revitalization

1.

The generation of substantial numbers of new jobs of a wide range of income levels over

the long term, including jobs for local populations.

2.

The creation of a hub for new and growing industries, such as clean technology, to the

Baylands by providing a critical mass of commercial development opportunities and other

incentives to attract both established and new companies.

3.

The creation of attractive local and regional retail and entertainment destinations that offer

Brisbane residents greater opportunity to shop and recreate within their City.

4.

The establishment of an integrated business environment that complements the existing

business community within Brisbane.

Ecological Enhancements

1.

The creation of a dynamic open space network that incorporates existing wetlands and

native habitats, with opportunities for passive and active recreation, urban parks, productive

landscapes and visual and ecological connectivity between San Bruno Mountain, Brisbane

Lagoon, and the San Francisco Bay.

2.

The reconnection to local ecology through restorative efforts and interpretive programs,

resulting in improved ecological productivity and understanding.

Sustainable Living

1.

The integration of the Baylands with regional transit networks that allow residents and

employees to conveniently connect with the greater Bay Area.

2.

A circulation network of “complete streets” balancing efficient circulation of pedestrian,

bicycle, transit, and personal vehicles with human safety.

3.

The creation of mixed-use districts that are walkable, pedestrian-friendly and easily

accessible by transit, resulting in a vibrant street environment and lower traffic volumes

than with typical development.

4.

Include sufficient residential density in proximity to transit and jobs, to create a sustainable

community that supports neighborhood-serving retail and encourages use of walking and

public transportation to minimize the use and impacts of private automobiles.

5.

A comprehensive sustainability program that unites on-site power generation, energy-

efficient buildings and infrastructure, water-efficient building and landscaping, and best

management practices for stormwater management and waste minimization.

6.

The development of distinctive, high-quality neighborhoods that accommodate regional

housing demands and contribute to Brisbane’s strong sense of place.

7.

The inclusion of community facilities that will support and connect existing and future

Brisbane residents.

8.

Enhance the viewshed of Brisbane through sustainable design and provide opportunities for

public art.

3.13.3 Objectives Identified by Recology, Inc.

Recology, Inc. has identified the following two primary objectives for its proposed

redevelopment and expansion of the existing Recology solid waste transfer facility, included as

part of the CPP-V concept plan scenario:

1.

Replace aging and deteriorating infrastructure; and

2.

Provide the infrastructure needed to achieve San Francisco’s goal of zero waste.

3.14 Phasing and Implementation

The analysis in this EIR assumes that Project Site development, as proposed by any of the four

Concept Plan scenarios, is anticipated to occur over a 20-year period.

Remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater within the former landfill area and two

Operable Units would be initiated and occur along with some grading of the Project Site during

the first phase of development. Post-grading construction of buildings, infrastructure, and open

space would occur over the course of Project buildout, depending upon market conditions.

Due to the lack of existing infrastructure throughout the Project Site, a considerable amount of

basic backbone infrastructure is required prior to construction of buildings. Such infrastructure

would be constructed in phases, with consideration of proximity to existing infrastructure,

funding availability, technical requirements, and market timing.

Because existing infrastructure is located primarily along Bayshore Boulevard, the first phase of

development would occur on the former railyard portion of the Project Site and would proceed

eastward from there. Relocation of the existing lumberyards and expansion of the existing

Recology facility (in the CPP-V Concept Plan scenario) could also occur in the first phase of

development. The second major phase of development would be triggered by the extension of

Geneva Avenue from Bayshore Boulevard to US Highway 101 and reconfiguration of the

Candlestick Point interchange. Also affecting the second phase of development would be the

completion of the first phase of the Bayshore Intermodal Station.

Available vacant areas within the Project Site would be used for construction staging areas and

parking of construction workers’ personal vehicles. No offsite construction employee parking or

staging areas would be necessary.

As noted above, phasing of demolition and deconstruction activities would allow existing utility

services, vehicular access areas, and vegetation to remain in place as long as possible in order to reduce disruption of existing uses.

A more detailed phasing schedule would be included within a Master Deconstruction and

Demolition Plan that will be prepared in coordination with the City. This plan would include

documentation of hazardous materials determination; demolition or deconstruction

recommendations; a list of potentially recyclable materials; potential location of the

asphalt/concrete recycling plant, if required; City-approved haul routes; dust control measures;

and a phasing schedule to show which areas of the site would be demolished or deconstructed

during each phase of infrastructure construction.

3.15 Use of this EIR

This EIR evaluates at a program level the environmental effects of implementation of the Project

Site development components described below and previously presented in Table 3-1.

•

A Concept Plan for the development of the Baylands, as required by the Brisbane

General Plan prior to development, and for which four development scenarios (DSP,

DSP-V, CPP, and CPP-V) are evaluated at an equal level of detail.

•

Amendments to the Brisbane General Plan as needed to ensure consistency of the

ultimately selected Concept Plan with the provisions of the General Plan.

•

A Specific Plan submitted to the City by UPC detailing development for the two “Developer

Sponsored Plan” scenarios (DSP and DSP-V).

•

Proposed expansion of the existing Recology facility, which is included in the CPP-V

Concept Plan scenario only.

•

Relocation of existing lumberyards to a different location within the Baylands, which is

proposed for each of the Concept Plan scenarios.

•

Remediation of hazardous materials contamination within the former railyard and landfill

areas of the Project Site, which is proposed for each of the Concept Plan scenarios.

•

Importation of water supply to the Baylands and the City, which is proposed for each of the

Concept Plan scenarios.

This program EIR is intended to provide an exhaustive consideration of the environmental effects

of the Project Site development at a level of detail appropriate for a Concept Plan, the Specific

Plan for the DSP and DSP-V Concept Plan scenarios, and associated site preparation and

infrastructure development. This includes a comprehensive, program-level analysis of the

proposed remedial actions and importation of water supply, as required prior to development of

the Project Site. This program-level analysis is intended to consider the impacts of development

under each Concept Plan scenario at an equal level of detail, commensurate with the extent of

detail available at this time. As such, where greater detail is available for certain Project

components, such as the Specific Plan for the DSP and DSP-V scenario and the expansion of the

Recology site, a more detailed analysis is provided.

Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a program EIR as an EIR that may be prepared on

a series of actions that can be characterized as one large project and are related either

(1) geographically; (2) as logical parts in the chain of contemplated actions; (3) in connection

with issuance of rules, regulations, plans, or other general criteria to govern the conduct of a

continuing program; or (4) as individual activities carried out under the same authorizing

statutory or regulatory authority and having generally similar environmental effects that can be

mitigated in similar ways. Insofar as the components of the Project Site development, as

approved, would include a plan and policy framework that would govern future development

within a discrete geographic area within Brisbane (and an adjacent portion of San Francisco and

other offsite infrastructure locations), such a program-level approach is considered appropriate.

Future projects that would fall within the purview of this program-level analysis would be

evaluated in light of the program EIR to determine whether their implementation would require

subsequent or supplemental environmental analysis. Additional CEQA compliance for specific

projects or components proposed under the selected Concept Plan scenario would be required

where site-specific impacts of the development proposal(s) were not addressed at a sufficient

level of detail in this program EIR, or in the event subsequent changes are proposed to the

selected scenario that were not analyzed in this EIR. This includes those proposed actions over

which other agencies have approval authority, such as the proposed remedial actions overseen by

the RWQCB, the San Mateo County Health Agency, and DTSC; the water supply transfer by

OID, MID and SFPUC; and the Recology expansion requiring permits from San Francisco. The

approval of these actions would rely upon the analysis presented in this EIR, provided that the

information related to such actions that is analyzed herein is sufficient and remains current.

Overall, the analysis of the Project Site development components identified above is intended to

avoid duplicative reconsideration of basic policy considerations and to allow the City of Brisbane as Lead Agency to consider broad policy alternatives and programwide mitigation measures at an

early stage when it has greater flexibility to avoid or mitigate environmental impacts. The analysis of Project impacts under CEQA also can promote environmental sustainability by encouraging the

incorporation of development standards and strategies into Project design, and by requiring

implementation of mitigation measures that not only avoid or minimize significant impacts but

also promote the responsible use of environmental resources. Additionally, the EIR analysis will

allow for the quantification of various environmental factors that contribute to environmental

sustainability, such as greenhouse gas emissions, water usage, energy usage and generation, and

solid waste generation, thereby allowing the four Concept Plan scenarios and project alternatives

to be compared according to their relative performance in regard to these various sustainability

factors.

3.15.1 Required Approvals and Actions

This EIR is intended to provide the information and environmental analysis necessary to assist the City in considering all the approvals and actions necessary for approval of any of the four

Concept Plan scenarios. It will also serve as a programmatic environmental document under

CEQA supporting subsequent, tiered CEQA environmental documentation for specific projects

contemplated by a Concept Plan (CPP and CPP-V scenarios) or Specific Plan (DSP and DSP-V

scenarios). After consideration of the EIR’s analysis, the City may select, with or without

modifications, or not select any one of the four Concept Plan scenarios. Consistent with the

CEQA Guidelines, the City also has the authority to modify and approve any of the Project Site

development alternatives that are discussed and analyzed in Chapter 5 of this EIR rather than the

components of the Project Site development.

The following subsections provide a description of the approvals and subsequent environmental

review required to adopt and implement a land use plan for the Brisbane Baylands. As noted

below, preparation, as needed, and adoption of a specific plan is required prior to development of the Baylands. As required by the Brisbane General Plan, a specific plan corresponding to the

selected Concept Plan scenario – whether it is the DSP, DSP-V, CPP, or CPP-V, an alternative

evaluated in this EIR, or a modification of any of these – would need to be adopted in accordance

with the requirements set forth in Government Code Section 65451 for the structure and content

of a specific plan. As discussed previously, a Specific Plan has been proposed by UPC for the

DSP and DSP-V scenarios; implementation of any other Concept Plan development scenarios or

alternatives would require the preparation and approval of a specific plan and further

environmental review under CEQA.

The portion of the proposed expansion of the Recology facility that is within San Francisco will

require approval by the City and County of San Francisco. As an agency responsible for

approving a project where more than one public agency is involved, San Francisco is identified as

a Responsible Agency. As noted below, approvals from San Francisco would be required for the

construction of buildings associated with the Recology expansion, roadway and transit facilities

improvements, and sewer and water supply infrastructure improvements.

Approvals Required from the City of Brisbane

Development of the Project Site will require the following approvals from the City of Brisbane:

•

Selection of a Concept Plan for the Brisbane Baylands;

•

Adoption of a General Plan amendment, as needed, to ensure consistency between the

Concept Plan and the Brisbane General Plan;

•

Adoption of a Specific Plan;

•

Adoption of amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, as needed, to ensure consistency among

the specific plan, General Plan, and Zoning Ordinance and to establish the land use

regulations and development standards set forth in the specific plan as the regulatory

authority governing future Project Site development;

•

Discretionary approvals and grading and building permits for expansion of the Recology

facility (CPP-V scenario only); and

•

Subsequent required approvals, including development agreement(s), planned development

permits, conditional use permits, design permits, subdivision map approvals, and grading

and building permits. These subsequent approvals may also require additional CEQA

compliance, as noted below.

Permits and Approvals Required from Other Agencies

The Concept Plan development scenarios and proposed Specific Plan for the DSP and DSP-V

scenarios described above do not stand alone from a regulatory perspective. Development within

the Baylands must comply with other federal, state, and local regulations. The individual resource chapters in this EIR discuss these requirements to the extent that they would shape the way

development occurs with the Concept Plan development scenarios.

Future development of the Baylands would require the following approvals from other agencies:

•

Landfill Closure Permit, Landfill Closure Plan and Post-Closure Maintenance Plan (State

Water Resources Control Board, BAAQMD, and CalRecycle/San Mateo County

Department of Environmental Health Services Agency).

•

Remedial Action Plan and Remedial Design and Implementation Plan (DTSC and

RWQCB).

•

Gas Collection and Control System Design Plan (BAAQMD).

•

Water Supply and Conveyance Agreements (OID, MID, and SFPUC).

•

Water and/or sanitary sewer connection permits (Guadalupe Valley Municipal

Improvement District).

•

Interagency Cooperation Agreements to coordinate and implement roadway and utility

improvements as follows:

-

BSD: utility relocation coordination;

-

City and County of San Francisco: Expansion of the Recology site, roadway and

transit facilities improvements, bus route realignments, sewer and water supply

infrastructure improvements.

-

City of Daly City: Bayshore Boulevard roadway and Bayshore Boulevard/Geneva

Avenue intersection improvements and transit facilities improvements.

-

NCFA: expansion of fire facilities.

-

San Francisco County Transportation Authority: Transportation corridors and transit

facilities improvements.

-

San Mateo County Congestion Management Agency: Regional transportation

facilities and roadway improvements.

-

San Mateo County Transportation District: bus route realignments and transit

facilities improvements.

•

BCDC design review approval and permit for development within the 100-foot shoreline

band. The lagoon and Visitacion Creek are both subject to tidal action from San Francisco

Bay. Any development that occurs within the 100-foot shoreline band of these features

requires BCDC review.

•

Bay Trail Review (Association of Bay Area Governments).

•

Streambed Alteration Agreement (CDFW) and Section 404 permit (Corps) for activities in

or around Visitacion Creek as part of the closure requirements of the RWQCB.

•

Water quality certification, NPDES permit, and waste discharge requirement compliance

(RWQCB).

•

Air quality permits (BAAQMD).

•

Incidental Take Permit, if necessary, for special-status species (CDFW).

•

State Lands Commission approvals, if necessary. Portions of the Project Site development

that occupy filled and unfilled tidelands and submerged lands sold into private ownership

by the State Lands Commission, and that remain submerged or subject to tidal action, are

subject to a Public Trust easement retained by the state. Any portion of the Project Site

development located within the Guadalupe Canal would require a lease from State Lands

Commission.

•

California Public Utilities Commission approval to modify an existing highway rail

crossing or to construct a new crossing.

•

Encroachment permits if construction occurs in right-of-way owned by Caltrans or the

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain).

•

Project Study Report/ Project Report/Plan Specifications and Estimates (Caltrans).

•

Regional transportation funding (Metropolitan Transportation Commission).

•

City and County of San Francisco discretionary approvals and grading and building permits

for expansion of the Recology facility within San Francisco’s boundaries (CPP-V scenario

only).

•

Transportation Demand Management Program (City/County Association of Governments.

•

Required approvals for location, design, and construction of Kindergarten through

eighth grade school facilities by the Bayshore ESD (DSP and DSP-V scenarios).

•

Required approvals for location, design, and construction of grade 9-12 school facilities by

the JUHSD.

3.15.2 Subsequent/Additional Environmental Review

This EIR analyzes, on a program level, future development that may occur within the Project Site.

Future individual projects and permits requiring discretionary actions, and therefore subject to the provisions of CEQA, will be evaluated to consider whether all environmental effects associated

with the specific development proposal have been adequately assessed in this EIR, pursuant to

CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, which sets forth the circumstances under which a lead agency

must prepare a subsequent environmental document.

3.16 References

Bayshore Sanitary District (BSD), official website, ht

tp://b a y shoresanitar y .co m

/ about/ i nde

x.h t m

l,

2012.

BKF Engineers (BKF), Brown and Caldwell, Geosyntec, GrafCon, Millenium Design, and

Treadwell & Rollo, Draft Brisbane Baylands Infrastructure Plan, (Chapter 11, Dry Utility Systems), prepared for Universal Paragon Corporation, February 2011.

Burns & McDonnell (B&M), Revised Remedial Action Plan (Revised RAP) Southern Area of the

Former Bayshore Railyard Site, February 2002.

Burns & McDonnell (B&M), Interim Remedial Measure Workplan Southern Area of the Former

Bayshore Railyard Suite (OU-2) Brisbane, California, prepared for Sunquest Properties,

Inc. July 2004.

California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Order no. 01-041, Waste

Discharge Requirements and Recision of Order no. 58-278 and Abatement Order 94-134,

Brisbane Class III Landfill, Brisbane, San Mateo County, San Francisco Bay Region,

April 18, 2001.

City of Brisbane, The 1994 General Plan, adopted June 21, 1994.

City of Brisbane, Revised Notice of Preparation for the Brisbane Baylands Specific Plan

Environmental Impact Report, December 7, 2010.

City of Brisbane, Zoning Map, July 2003.

Dyett & Bhatia, Land Use Classifications developed for the Community Preferred Plan, 2011.

Geosyntech Consultants, Memorandum, Potential Remedial Technologies for Brisbane Baylands

OU2 and OU2, to ESA, March 2, 2012.

Meisner, Robert, Commander, Brisbane Police Department, email communication, June 29, 2011.

North County Fire Authority (NCFA) website, h ttp:// w

w

w.northcoun t y fire.org/sections/ho m

e /

overview.htm, viewed April 27, 2011.

RBF Consulting, Storm Drainage Master Plan, Final Report, City of Brisbane, November 2003.

Recology, Inc., Data Request Response, December 2011.

San Francisco Department of the Environment and Recology San Francisco, San Francisco

Household Hazards Waste Collection Facility Operation Plan, July 2011.

Universal Paragon Corporation (UPC), Draft Brisbane Baylands Specific Plan, February 2011.